The will is attached to either emotions , reason or imagination , it
is never alone. The attachments of will are its binding factors. When
you try to control your emotions it is the reason which has become
attached to your will and when you run after the three " w 's " it is
desire which has become attached to your will. You say there is free
will within constraints , yes , but there are always some constraints
or the other. The will is never alone.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdouglas@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are bound by your psyche, but your psyche does not rule you. You can if
> you wish or if you choose, make an effert through a force of will to calm
> down, you can if you so choose to not react in anger. Of course you can
> also effect a change in your psyche in accordance with your will, or do you
> deny this?
>
> Or are you claiming here that our emotions rule us? The free choice is that
> you are able to choose at all, yes yes, you are of course restricted in your
> choices, you cannot fly unaided for example, but you can of course choose to
> throw your tea or not, you do have that control.
>
> Detriminism, or more properly the belife in it, is certianly a faith based
> belief, unless of course we can show each and every constituant that somehow
> forces your actions, then you are simply placing faith in determinism.
>
> Of course you know me and so you may understand that I see nothing
> inherently wrong in faith based belife and claim it more prevalent that is
> commonly thought, however what place has it in the process of logical
> reasoning?
>
> In another post at the moment there is much talk about being slaves and not
> free to do as we wish, I can't get with this at all, it seems so clearly and
> completely wrong. We have 100% freedom of choice (within our bounderies).
> We can choose not to be enslaved by wages, our vast history of counter
> culture shows us this is possible, but being as we are creatures of intelect
> and emotion and society, and seeing as our world currently follows the great
> God Cash, this choice is not taken up by many.
> There is a foolhardy saying about freedom of speech and us noty being free
> to shout fire in a packed theatre, this is also clearly not true. You can
> of course shout any words you like in a packed theatre (what force is
> stopping you from doing so?) however cause and effect being what it is means
> that if you where to shout such a thing, then you have to bear the
> consequences. Hah hah of if you choose not to, then you can run away and
> try not to be caught, not an action I sanction of course, but an exaple of
> freedom of choice.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 6 June 2012 11:36:11 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> I am sitting near my bed and sipping tea in a very cool frame of mind
>> , even the thought of spilling tea doesn't come to my mind. But on
>> another day I am very unhappy due to various reasons and am feeling so
>> frustrated that I become so agitated that I don't spill tea but
>> actually throw the whole cup on my bed. I am the same person but the
>> circumstances and my psyche at that moment are completely different ,
>> so where is my freedom of choice ? Am I not actually bound by my
>> psyche ? Is not freedom of will just a belief ?
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdouglas@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I think that is a massive statment to make, so heh let me make another
>> > one.
>> >
>> > If we are to belive cause and effect, and surley there is no getting
>> > away
>> > from it, then all things are bound by their nature, enviroment and
>> > verious
>> > other things. So to claim that we have no free choice because we, like
>> > everything else, are bound by our nature and enviroment, I think is
>> > wrong,
>> > and far to simplistic a way to see things.
>> >
>> > Our freedom of choice lies in the fact that we can indeed choose. You
>> > may
>> > not spill tea on your bed because knowing that you wpuld not liek to
>> > soil
>> > your bed you may choose not to take your tea anywhere near it. However
>> > the
>> > fact remains that if you choose, disoite your dislike of gettiong hot
>> > tea on
>> > your bed, you can still walk over to you bed, cup in hand and tip the
>> > whole
>> > thing over it.
>> >
>> > We are free to choose within the bounds that we have and that my friend
>> > is
>> > what we mean by free will.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, 5 June 2012 18:15:24 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Why don't I spill tea on my bed ? One reason is that it would spoil my
>> >> bed , another is that I hold myself responsible for any such action.
>> >> But does that make me really free in the matter of choice ? Nope! my
>> >> choice is bound by my psyche, which in turn is bound by matter in the
>> >> form of this human body and the environment interacting with it.

About Me
- Dulce
Blog Archive
- outubro 2025 (1)
- setembro 2025 (1)
- setembro 2024 (1)
- junho 2024 (1)
- abril 2024 (1)
- março 2024 (3)
- fevereiro 2024 (7)
- janeiro 2024 (5)
- dezembro 2023 (12)
- novembro 2023 (21)
- outubro 2023 (14)
- setembro 2023 (34)
- agosto 2023 (22)
- julho 2023 (112)
- junho 2023 (66)
- maio 2023 (52)
- abril 2023 (81)
- março 2023 (72)
- fevereiro 2023 (64)
- janeiro 2023 (44)
- dezembro 2022 (21)
- novembro 2022 (54)
- outubro 2022 (79)
- setembro 2022 (103)
- agosto 2022 (133)
- julho 2022 (96)
- junho 2022 (1)
- fevereiro 2022 (2)
- dezembro 2021 (1)
- novembro 2021 (1)
- outubro 2021 (31)
- setembro 2021 (71)
- fevereiro 2021 (6)
- janeiro 2021 (9)
- dezembro 2020 (1)
- julho 2020 (2)
- junho 2020 (12)
- maio 2020 (1)
- abril 2020 (15)
- março 2020 (13)
- fevereiro 2020 (4)
- setembro 2019 (12)
- agosto 2019 (28)
- julho 2019 (42)
- abril 2019 (10)
- março 2019 (48)
- fevereiro 2019 (207)
- janeiro 2019 (64)
- dezembro 2018 (3)
- novembro 2018 (1)
- outubro 2018 (2)
- junho 2018 (2)
- maio 2018 (1)
- novembro 2017 (3)
- outubro 2017 (2)
- setembro 2017 (2)
- julho 2017 (2)
- junho 2017 (6)
- maio 2017 (12)
- abril 2017 (3)
- março 2017 (1)
- fevereiro 2017 (3)
- novembro 2016 (4)
- agosto 2016 (1)
- julho 2016 (4)
- junho 2016 (4)
- maio 2016 (1)
- outubro 2015 (9)
- setembro 2015 (5)
- julho 2015 (5)
- junho 2015 (3)
- maio 2015 (98)
- abril 2015 (256)
- março 2015 (1144)
- fevereiro 2015 (808)
- janeiro 2015 (470)
- dezembro 2014 (322)
- novembro 2014 (249)
- outubro 2014 (361)
- setembro 2014 (218)
- agosto 2014 (93)
- julho 2014 (163)
- junho 2014 (61)
- maio 2014 (90)
- abril 2014 (45)
- março 2014 (119)
- fevereiro 2014 (71)
- janeiro 2014 (97)
- dezembro 2013 (95)
- novembro 2013 (182)
- outubro 2013 (79)
- setembro 2013 (99)
- agosto 2013 (139)
- julho 2013 (98)
- junho 2013 (185)
- maio 2013 (332)
- abril 2013 (99)
- março 2013 (102)
- fevereiro 2013 (231)
- janeiro 2013 (264)
- dezembro 2012 (361)
- novembro 2012 (396)
- outubro 2012 (265)
- setembro 2012 (316)
- agosto 2012 (362)
- julho 2012 (163)
- junho 2012 (332)
- maio 2012 (167)
- abril 2012 (165)
- março 2012 (156)
- fevereiro 2012 (246)
- janeiro 2012 (332)
- dezembro 2011 (348)
- novembro 2011 (176)
- outubro 2011 (147)
- setembro 2011 (378)
- agosto 2011 (222)
- julho 2011 (31)
- junho 2011 (37)
- maio 2011 (27)
- abril 2011 (26)
- março 2011 (49)
- fevereiro 2011 (36)
- janeiro 2011 (42)
- dezembro 2010 (49)
- novembro 2010 (46)
- outubro 2010 (23)
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)

0 comentários:
Postar um comentário