Mind's Eye Re:

Remarkable Edward - though the Gnostics went somewhat further.
Respect is generally good, but I don't like to be threatened into it.

On 14 May, 18:09, Edward Mason <masonedward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In effort to begin where I left off, Archytas, it is a good thing that you
> don't waste your time in search of any of the artifacts listed in any of
> the first five books of the Torah, the first five books of the Old
> Testament . These books were written as allegorical to simplify the Laws
> inherent in reaching the formation of the triangle (Knowledge, Wisdom, and
> Understanding). They describe the battle and the journey each individual
> faces in that process. They also simplify the Spiritual Laws of ancient
> Egypt from the more than 40 Laws to the 10, which were later broken down
> again by Jesus to 2.
>
> As for the teachings of Jesus ( which was not his name), we should should
> note that what we got as his teachings were instituted by Paul. Jesus spoke
> in parables to all except his disciple, explicitly for the purpose that the
> people would not get it. Then the disciple were either killed or exiled
> within 70 years after Jesus left the scene and the writings which they left
> were burned and forbidden. It should also be noted that Jesus told of this
> theft in a parable where the keepers of the vineyard killed the son and
> claimed his inheritance. Daniel also spoke of it when he mentioned
> the Proclamation that would be set up which would defy The very Laws that
> would elevate humanity; ( bring blood into the temple).
>
> To get more reasoning to this scenario one could compare Isaiah 6:9-13; and
> Matthew 13:10-17; and 34:10. You will see one difference in Isaiah and
> Matthew, where Isaiah said you go and blind them making them hard-hearted
> and deft. But in Matthew these writers wrote as if the people done it to
> themselves. This should not be surprising given the intentions involved.
>
> This would place us in our present state; in the furnish were we would be
> purified by the flames of judgement. Our only hope is to attain the right
> state in regard to the Laws regardless who or what we recognize as God, the
> controlling forces of doing good or bad. It is not even necessary that one
> believe in a god as long as they can arrive at a state where they recognize
> and respect the powers of this force and the need to respect their fellow
> man as himself. But somehow this is just too simple. Man tends to need it
> more complicated or he is tempted by the benefits of keeping such knowledge
> from the people.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.