All the participants in this discussion except me, as far as I understand, are against giving people the choice to separate and be independent of the country they find themselves in. It seems to me that it means that all the participants that are against this "friendly separation" must be in favor of letting people fight to the bitter end for their separation, and/or for forcing people to stay united against their will.
My question to you all is the following: Do you feel the same way about forcing people to live together against their will also in families like in the case of divorce.
A second question: How about past historic events of "separation" like that in America from the British, or more recently in the eastern block countries in Europe from the Soviet Union'
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 8:24:16 PM UTC+2, Gabby wrote:
-- My question to you all is the following: Do you feel the same way about forcing people to live together against their will also in families like in the case of divorce.
A second question: How about past historic events of "separation" like that in America from the British, or more recently in the eastern block countries in Europe from the Soviet Union'
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 8:24:16 PM UTC+2, Gabby wrote:
......And no, I don't buy the friendly separation. You develop in different directions, yes. I find the choice argument particularly often used by those who have not been fairly voted into their ownership status btw.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário