[Mind's Eye] Re: The Protocols of Reaction

Agreed. It should be no surprise that the current financial
repression breeds anarchy - the old Chomsky adage. This again, is
recognizing what is falling away. What is emerging?

On Aug 21, 1:19 am, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Neil is close...
> Here physics is obvious:http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/16-8
>
> On Aug 19, 11:57 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.economist.com/blogs/bagehot/2011/08/civil-disorder-and-loo...
>
> > We had riots in England a couple of weeks ago.  Our media was full of
> > people, including reporters, stating this was a new issue and
> > unprecedented.  I did not believe this as I watched - though I did see
> > a great deal I recognised from GTA games.  The above link to the
> > Economist makes use of a book by Pearson I read years ago - it casts a
> > very different view that our riots were really only history repeating
> > itself.
>
> > I don't believe human thought can 'rid itself' of emotional response
> > (or should).  I do believe we can do better than 'knee-jerk reactions'
> > - but I also believe this is quite difficult and beyond many people
> > left to their own devices.  I believe our democracies are weak at the
> > moment and that this is because we can't argue very well - hence
> > politicians appeal to much that is populist and wrong using highly
> > dubious techniques.
>
> > I'm sure I could identify the protocols that appeal to 'ignorant
> > Idols' that lead to situations of 'nopolitics' in our societies and
> > thus the rule of the very rich through "economics" in a way far more
> > centralised than any politburo.
>
> > I've pretty much given up on democracy.  Teaching is very frustrating
> > because you want to encourage self-learning and resourceful human
> > beings and also know this is too much for most - democracy is
> > similar.  The struggle is knowing this and not wanting to be elitist
> > and sneer at others.  I succeed a bit in 'adventures with ideas' but
> > the same mistakes in reaction crop up time and time and time again in
> > wider social action.
>
> > I wonder if outing the protocols of the dreary positions people take
> > in reaction could help us actually find dialogue?