[Mind's Eye] Re: "Beyond 'New Atheism'" By Gary Gutting

Meh! As we know religion has no claim on the roots of morality.
Should we judge any ideal by the behaviour of the ideals proponantes?

I don't think we should. Surely we should look at the idea itself and
the ideals it promotes?

I try to be non bigoted, but I still enjoy the racist joke. Shall we
judge the idea of racial harmony by the idea itself or by my laughing
at the odd racist joke?

Back on track though. I'm still astounded by the majority of this. I
know what makes me happy, I know how I wish to live my life, and I
certianly resent anybody telling me that my lifes choices are not
right. How do they know? What I do, what I belive, IS right for me,
and I would not be so rude as to tell somebody else what to belive or
not.

On Sep 16, 11:29 am, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/14/atheism-scientific-ve...
>
> I read this late yesterday and a few reader comments which stressed a
> child's lack of choice in matters of religious denomination and
> practice so I feel I was on the "beam". I thought further- but did not
> post- that we judge a religion by the behavior of its followers/
> believers and if that is negative it cannot help but color our
> attitude about that religion.
>
> My experience with Notre Dame leaves a great deal to be desired, as
> well. So why should I trust Gary Gutting?

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário