You might include the division of sexes as it relates to slavery/
rights (I could include a letter of Alexander Hamilton's- maybe later)
without being put off by the modern women's movement and miltatnt
feminism as well as the play between "selfish madness" and a healthy
survival instinct. There are societal structures as powerful as the
political, obviously.
Why do you think philosophy is capable of "answers"? My feeling is
that the best it can do is question.
I will think more about this...
On Sep 26, 10:22 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had to read a lot of dross as an academic and I find it gets into
> my writing in ways I don't want it to. I rarely find myself excited
> or inspired by the academy outside of some science. Occasional
> writers like Lyotard or Joseph Heller in 'Picture This' appeal to my
> enjoyment delayed humour. One particular aspect of 'great writing'
> that worries me is that one gets sucked into the arguments made and
> yet know at the same time the ability to make them did not shift the
> writers from what we now regard as glaring injustices like slavery. I
> know people like Moses (the war criminal of Numbers 31) and Plato and
> Aristotle (slavery OK were men of their time, but that isn't my
> point. Even John Locke argued slaves taken in just wars deserved
> their fate.
>
> The Greeks knew it was fairly easy to make equally powerful and
> contradictory argument. I (for instance) favour modern reliableism
> and structured realism as a philosophic base but prefer to say I'm a
> tropical fish realist - this at least admits philosophy isn't my first
> consideration. Some won't have a clue what I'm on about. Mostly,
> I've learned most arguments are suspicious and based on assumptions
> that don't 'ground' (like gods, human nature in economics) or are
> subjective in the sense that allows liars like Blair and most
> politicians to lie and tell us they tested information they made
> decisions on in personal integrity. In the meantime, modern slavery
> goes on in the sense of war and economics taking us down the road to
> serfdom. I see little hope of philosophical answers to any of this
> because they have a long history of failure.
>
> I'm led to a view that our societies are based on selfish madness -or
> at least that we should examine what's going on as we might examine
> religious belief in its dafter forms. I'd start with our common
> virtue ethics. I'm aware of 'Beyond Virtue' (McIntyre) but feel we
> need a darker analysis based more on social Idols. Any takers for a
> go?
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário