odd species. I agree with you 100% heh but I wonder how many others
would?
On Sep 23, 3:36 am, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> :cringe: That was me being a wee bit sensitive, guess now you know one
> of my soft spots. ;-) I agree though, personal responsibility goes
> beyond the numbers. We need to be willing to make a change, courageous
> enough to demand honest understanding from ourselves, and when the
> sheer horror sinks in (see those numbers as those one cares about
> most) we need enough wits collected to turn our anger and indignation
> into social progress, personal wisdom and all that good stuff people
> should be natural at.
>
> Sorry I was blinded Gabby and missed the finer point, one's wits can
> be quite evasive to collection hiding amongst the formative substrata.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Nothing important. Sorry if my humor was inappropriate.
>
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> You're right, I didn't. Please be courteous Gabby, you have no idea
> >> the things I know, have seen, or the impact on my life. For another
> >> time perhaps.
>
> >> So, what else did you mean by this? :)
>
> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:34 AM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Exactly, finding women's dealing with the world (as a landscape you can
> >> > measure and therefore manage - aka statistics) stimulating, would be a
> >> > good
> >> > example of how I don't think social responsibility works. Not that you
> >> > had
> >> > ever said that! :)
>
> >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:41 AM, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> Don't get me wrong I found his work stimulating several years ago and
> >> >> also enjoyed Sam Harris's Moral Landscape and I cannot remember the
> >> >> other (Atheist Manifesto maybe). I can relate heavily with much of the
> >> >> conversation and the plight but, alas, an Atheist I am not, the world
> >> >> is not so convenient as to provide me a package to quite swallow
> >> >> though I take bites here and there of a variety. :)
>
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Really? I don't- he has a wonderful playfulness with our language and
> >> >> > can "zing" with the best of them. He has to protect his intellectual
> >> >> > turf, afterall, plus who can resist anyone with any sort of
> >> >> > connection
> >> >> > to "Dr. Who"?
>
> >> >> > I am not a celebrity therefore my opinions are probably meaningless.
>
> >> >> > On Sep 19, 10:08 pm, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> I find Dawkins a bit too arrogant for my taste, I would really like
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> know what you think instead.
>
> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:39 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > You might want to check out Richard Dawkins who has covered
> >> >> >> > several
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > our topics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
>
> >> >> >> > On Sep 19, 11:09 am, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at
> >> >> >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the
> >> >> >> >> world
> >> >> >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their
> >> >> >> >> potential
> >> >> >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0
>
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but
> >> >> >> >> > kept
> >> >> >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe
> >> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >> > first
> >> >> >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the
> >> >> >> >> > "assembly
> >> >> >> >> > line".- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário