[Mind's Eye] Re: From cradle to grave

Excellent example, Lee! Many women were as nasty as men when they
achieved power- some relying on male ministers for advice, however.

I don't think gender has anything to do with humanism but males have
had more freedom to express themselves. Plus women were denied a full
education until recently with few exceptions- am thinking of math and
science, in particular. Also, there's that whole beauty-sex thing that
cripples one. Anyway, that's changing- we'll see where it ends up.

On Sep 20, 3:29 am, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heheh tell that to Maggie Thatcher!
>
> On Sep 20, 4:44 am, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A pittance in comparison to potential womanhood no doubt, imagine a
> > world with mostly educated and knowledgeable women. It might look more
> > like the world we should be working toward, more of the 'caring'
> > perspective perhaps.
>
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:43 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Culture represses and culture is still paternalistic because men
> > > control religion, politics, war and the economy.
>
> > > On Sep 19, 1:19 pm, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> That is interesting Gabby, could you explain some more how that would
> > >> make statistics look better? I've always thought child bearing can be
> > >> a detriment to women's learning and development, indeed it could be
> > >> used to keep them repressed. In my opinion there should be
> > >> incentives/rewards for people preventing accidental birth as much as
> > >> possible, but through some revesible means that would take an
> > >> intentional effort. I am curious of your insights about Germany and
> > >> womanhood! More please. :)
>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > I assume that this is another variation of the American dream. Here in
> > >> > Germany it is being discussed why especially educated women don't want to
> > >> > become the carrier of conception as much and often as they should to make
> > >> > the statistics look better.
>
> > >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at
> > >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world
> > >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their potential
> > >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0
>
> > >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but kept
> > >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the first
> > >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly line".- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -