Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Why Has Allan Been Barred From The Group ?

This is unacceptable.

Neil, and who else is not willing to keep on engaging here under these circumstances, could we please try to let common sense win?

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:43 AM, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyespam@yahoo.com> wrote:

gabby, thanks for the response. That is what I had guessed about you
and Vam but wanted to be sure since you brought it up.

Allan is banned from Minds Eye.

On Sep 15, 1:57 pm, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, Orn, not feeling attacked by Vam but being attacked by Vam. But I am
> able to stand my man here, thank you.
>
> What is Allan's current posting status, is what we'd like to know. Is he
> being banned, set on moderation or have only some of his posts been deleted?
> Thank you for providing us with factual information to help us increase the
> level objectivity.
>

> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:31 PM, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com

>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Moderation is and always has been subjective. It also is not
> > democratic no matter what pretense or trappings are added to it.
>
> > gabby, if you feel attacked by vam and want action, let me know
> > specifically and I'll address it. I use judgement when it comes to
> > individual cases.
>
> > Vam, yes it is serious and I've never taken the task/responsibility
> > lightly.
>
> > Also Vam, as egalitarian as your suggested method appears to be we are
> > not about trials here.
>
> > On Sep 15, 9:41 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I believe banning is a serious matter.
>
> > > I really have not kept track of what Allan has said or done. In the
> > > event, I feel there should be a separate thread titled : Why so-and-so
> > > deserves to be banned, by the Group rules !
>
> > > The person can then be clearly charged, allowed to respond, and a call
> > > taken by the Moderator in full public view. Shouldn't be difficult.
> > > After all you wouldn't be doing it every month.
>
> > > On Sep 15, 8:24 pm, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Vam, I deleted the offending posts. Allan himself knew he had gone
> > > > over the line and said so in one of his remaining posts. He followed
> > > > that one with more unprovoked direct attacks (self admitted/defined)
> > > > upon me. He knew what he was doing and what the result would be.
>
> > > > Evolution, freedom, acceptance and toleration include self
> > > > responsibility.
>
> > > > On Sep 14, 10:33 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > If true, as Allan himself informs me, the act seems disproportionate,
> > > > > a result of disbalanced mental process, and plain gross, as in
> > > > > absolute unfit for a Group comprising of such evolved members who
> > > > > believe in freedom, acceptance and toleration.
>
> > > > > I sure would like to hear the Moderator speak on this matter.- Hide
> > quoted text -
>

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -