is temporary, that you two can come to a mutual
agreement/reconciliation on this matter. There is a third party I
believe to this and hope that they too can reconcile and benefit from
the diversity and vigorous wealth of knowledge from the M-E community.
Best Regards
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:56 PM, ornamentalmind
<ornsmindseyespam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Vam, you don't like it. I get that. This is between Allan and me. He
> is banned from this group.
>
> On Sep 16, 9:52 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What are the specifics ?
>>
>> Which are the hyperbole ?
>>
>> Allan, my friend ? I do not even know him well.
>>
>> Loyalty ? What's loyalty got to do with this ?
>>
>> You've taken a decision, where you were on trial ! Remember that.
>>
>> On Sep 16, 9:48 pm, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Vam, your hyperbole is laudable especially when coming to the aid of a
>> > friend who is perceived to have been wronged. Loyalty has its place.
>> > The specifics in this case fly against your stance though.
>>
>> > On Sep 16, 5:57 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 16, 1:31 am, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > Moderation is and always has been subjective. It also is not
>> > > > democratic no matter what pretense or trappings are added to it.
>>
>> > > Subjectivity can include emotional instability and rank egotistic
>> > > stupidity. But we all work at learning to be on guard against that
>> > > because IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR. Especially Moderation of a
>> > > Group... with members who are pretty much evolved and conscientious on
>> > > their own. This Group has had the hallmarks of such great members...
>>
>> > > I wasn't meaning that the Moderation process be " Democratic." But it
>> > > certainly needs to be open and transparent.
>>
>> > > > gabby, if you feel attacked by vam and want action, let me know
>> > > > specifically and I'll address it. I use judgement when it comes to
>> > > > individual cases.
>>
>> > > Nothing in your judgement, Mr Moderator, can force me to give ' value
>> > > ' or assign so much ' worth ' to particular posts. I actually do not
>> > > give much value to Gabby's posts and actually assign much worth to
>> > > them. And I felt it necessary to say as much, when I did.
>>
>> > > > Vam, yes it is serious and I've never taken the task/responsibility
>> > > > lightly.
>>
>> > > Lightly ? No, OM, I do suggest you take the matter heavily. The
>> > > seriousness implies that the Moderator CANNOT be wrong in his
>> > > judgement in the context, even if he has to give the offender the
>> > > benefit of doubt everytime, all the time. As can be seen, you are in
>> > > absolute minority of ONE, from the reactions on this thread. Perhaps,
>> > > you need to look at your subjectivity...
>>
>> > > > Also Vam, as egalitarian as your suggested method appears to be we are
>> > > > not about trials here.
>>
>> > > Then you most definitely are not taking the matter " seriously " at
>> > > all. IT IS YOU WHO IS ON TRIAL everytime you have to take a banning
>> > > decision !
>>
>> > > > On Sep 15, 9:41 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > I believe banning is a serious matter.
>>
>> > > > > I really have not kept track of what Allan has said or done. In the
>> > > > > event, I feel there should be a separate thread titled : Why so-and-so
>> > > > > deserves to be banned, by the Group rules !
>>
>> > > > > The person can then be clearly charged, allowed to respond, and a call
>> > > > > taken by the Moderator in full public view. Shouldn't be difficult.
>> > > > > After all you wouldn't be doing it every month.
>>
>> > > > > On Sep 15, 8:24 pm, ornamentalmind <ornsmindseyes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > Vam, I deleted the offending posts. Allan himself knew he had gone
>> > > > > > over the line and said so in one of his remaining posts. He followed
>> > > > > > that one with more unprovoked direct attacks (self admitted/defined)
>> > > > > > upon me. He knew what he was doing and what the result would be.
>>
>> > > > > > Evolution, freedom, acceptance and toleration include self
>> > > > > > responsibility.
>>
>> > > > > > On Sep 14, 10:33 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > If true, as Allan himself informs me, the act seems disproportionate,
>> > > > > > > a result of disbalanced mental process, and plain gross, as in
>> > > > > > > absolute unfit for a Group comprising of such evolved members who
>> > > > > > > believe in freedom, acceptance and toleration.
>>
>> > > > > > > I sure would like to hear the Moderator speak on this matter.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
--
Please do not put me on forwarding lists or submit my address to cute
online greetings or anything else for that matter. If you must, please
forward me in BCC and send me a link to cute greetings. Many thanks!
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário