On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:01 AM, James Lynch <ashkashal@gmail.com> wrote:
Cute, is this true to the storyline of the creation of M-E or an
interesting narrative? I think the recent comparisons with AvC were to
point out what the moderator thinks this groups should avoid. What a
lovely rendition of perennial history besides, gabby! :)
--
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:19 PM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:
> Understand from repeated referrals that the group founding impetus was
> wanting to be better than A vs. C. Do all of you know what or who A
> and C are? They must have been so traumatic that the B role must have
> seemed the only way out. The holy trinity, the triad, the magic number
> was being reestablished, the opposing duality overcome - by being B.
> The being B impetus then started to develop its own dynamics. Being B
> was being better than doing A vs. C. Being B was being identified as
> being misleading in its terminology, so the B was omitted and the
> state of being declared as being the ultimate state.
>
> A myth has come into effect.
>
Please do not put me on forwarding lists or submit my address to cute
online greetings or anything else for that matter. If you must, please
forward me in BCC and send me a link to cute greetings. Many thanks!
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário