Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: faster than light neutrinos

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Pat <PatrickDHarrington@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 17, 9:49 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good luck, Pat ! I'm sure you have it from all others on this list
>> who've known you.
>>
>> Whether you're held up, are sauntering or are hurtling through your
>> future... keep us posted.
>>
>
> I'll try!  Today's bit of news is that the RRP has been set: £19.99.
> So, it's off to the printer's now.  Oh, and, of course, there's been
> another change in the cover design.  Now, I'ts going to have a
> chalkboard on it with wording as follows:
>
> -----------------------------------
> And God said,
>
> "( (E=MC^2) and (E=Fh) )--> ( (M<-->F) --> (h/C^2) )"
>
> And there was light!
> -----------------------------------
>
> Hopefully, the combination of scripture and equations will get the
> message across, as well as hit the funny bone.
>
> In a couple of weeks, once I have a copy available, the local
> newspaper, The Banbury Guardian, will, most likely, run a story about
> it.  They'd run it now, but they want a picture of me WITH the book in
> order to get the best publicity out of it.  They're angle will be
> that, not only does the book bring science and religion together but
> also explains 'dark energy' and 'the arrow of time', which are ground-
> breaking.
>
>> On Nov 17, 8:22 pm, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 3, 10:00 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > do I need to pre order your Pat?  if  that will help,,??   I am not a great
>> > > traveler,, I create problems for my self    but need to know things like
>> > > housing cost and then things like  transportation to and from airports and
>> > > which air port...  when it comes to traveling I really don't do much now
>> > > you know why.
>> > > Alla n
>>
>> > Completely understandable!  At the moment, ordering isn't possible as
>> > we have still yet to confirm the retail price.  Nonetheless, the
>> > website ishttp://newlimepublishing.com/.  You'll be able to see the
>> > 'place' where the book will be, but, as yet, all that's there is the
>> > placeholder.  Still, it's nice to see my name in lights, kinda,
>> > already.
>> > On another note, I've just sealed a deal to appear on Swindon 105.5
>> > radio on Monday, 19th Dec., 2011 at 10:00pm on Paul Devlin's show
>> > 'Outer Limits'.  It's a show about the paranormal and, as my theory
>> > can put some science behind the concept of eternal consciousness, it's
>> > on-topic enough for Paul to be kind enough to have me on-air.  It will
>> > be a 'Live' show, so, if anyone can tune in, please do.  I DO believe
>> > that the show will be available to download from their website a few
>> > hours after it has aired, although I'm not positive of that.  I'll
>> > check back with Paul and find out for sure and let you ALL know.  Next
>> > trick is to coerce the BBC to put me on air.  Wish me luck!!  ;-)
>>
>> > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Oct 27, 3:25 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > I normally.. buy my books though the ""Book Depository" in England,,  I
>> > > > like
>> > > > > their world wide free shipping..  either that I send you the money  you
>> > > > > sign it then send it to me..
>>
>> > > > Once we've printed a few, I can do that.  We're still on target for a
>> > > > release date on 21-Dec-2011, but I doubt it will be sooner.  Also--and
>> > > > this is, of course, for everyone--my publisher and I are thinking
>> > > > about whether or not to plan a 'launch' for the book.  That is, a
>> > > > public party to celebrate the publication.  The 'hitch', though, is
>> > > > that, before we plan it, we need to have enough people to make it
>> > > > worthwhile.  You are ALL, of course, invited and it would be held,
>> > > > most likely, in Stratford-upon-Avon.  I don't have a date, yet, for
>> > > > it; but, if, as I said, we have enough of a response to interest in
>> > > > attending, we'll plan it.  And, I suspect we would try to plan it for
>> > > > a date when MOST people could attend.  Please, let me know what you
>> > > > (all) think!!
>>
>> > > > > It is true  it repeats itself regularly.. CERN is not looking for a red
>> > > > > face..
>>
>> > > > But are they looking around dimensional corners?  I suspect not.  This
>> > > > 'revelation', of course, doesn't completely throw out the old
>> > > > textbooks like so many think.  It has NO bearing on Einstein's energy
>> > > > equation, E=MC^2, for example.  It only means that C is NOT the speed
>> > > > limit we thought is was and, of course, it implies that tachyons are,
>> > > > most likely, well...more likely.  The existence of tachyons is
>> > > > predicted by the original 26-dimensional String Theory and THAT is the
>> > > > basis for MY work, so, I'm not at all displeased with evidence that
>> > > > points towards tachyon-like particles.  If anything, it's another
>> > > > feather in my cap. LOL!!
>>
>> > > > > I do not see them rushing to build a second CERN  they are a little
>> > > > beyond
>> > > > > my pocket change at the moment (see me in 500 year then we will talk
>> > > > about
>> > > > > it)
>>
>> > > > In 500 years, there may well be a new universe and intelligent life
>> > > > (allowing for a rapid evolution via a large Hubble Constant--you know,
>> > > > a 6-day Creation!!) would still be fairly nascent regarding particle
>> > > > physics.  But, you might be the engineer behind the New
>> > > > Stonehenge!!  ;-)
>>
>> > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > okay Pat to quote you: Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that
>> > > > which
>> > > > > > > they WANT to see.
>>
>> > > > > > > That is true,, except it is strange  that on random timed tests the
>> > > > same
>> > > > > > > event occurs  and they are checking for neutrinos else where
>> > > >  looking to
>> > > > > > > eliminate the random event ..  what they are saying is "a particle is
>> > > > > > > arriving before it should.".. that it,, but that is very
>> > > > interesting..
>>
>> > > > > > > what it is   time will tell
>> > > > > > > Allan
>>
>> > > > > > Again, I agree.  Time will tell and the experiment and potential
>> > > > > > result were interesting.  It just needs to be repeated regularly, now,
>> > > > > > using different (but similar) equipment and between different
>> > > > > > locations.  It still could end up only implying that the neutrinos are
>> > > > > > discovering ways to exploit extra-dimensional short-cuts rather than
>> > > > > > actually moving faster-than-light.
>>
>> > > > > > BTW, everyone, I'm still on target for a 21-Dec-2011 release date for
>> > > > > > my book; however, the publisher has, now, changed the name of the
>> > > > > > publishing company and it will be published by 'New Lime Publishing'.
>> > > > > > I'll get you (plural) the website as soon as it's up and running.  I
>> > > > > > promise that New Lime will get you your copies as quickly as Amazon
>> > > > > > would; but, with a VERY key difference: when we see any of your names
>> > > > > > on the order forms, you can rest assured that your copies will be
>> > > > > > signed by the author (that's me!) with a unique message for each of
>> > > > > > you!!!!  Through Amazon, that kind of 'order scrutiny' would be
>> > > > > > impossible.
>>
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com
>>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 7:45 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > I don't think they know for sure just what they know for sure
>> > > > just
>> > > > > > what
>> > > > > > > > they
>> > > > > > > > > are something is arriving before the speed of light sez it
>> > > > should.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > I think that is cool
>> > > > > > > > > Allan
>>
>> > > > > > > > I think it's interesting, but they still can't rule out the fact
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > > > the neutrinos that arrived 'early' MAY have not come from CERN.
>> > > >  Every
>> > > > > > > > star emits neutrinos in all directions at any time and as it is
>> > > > very
>> > > > > > > > difficult to stop neutrinos, they pass through most
>> > > > > > > > everything...including the Earth.  The fact that Gran Sasso had
>> > > > > > > > created an object that WOULD stop neutrinos guarantees that, at
>> > > > some
>> > > > > > > > point in time, it would do just that.  They'll never be able to
>> > > > rule
>> > > > > > > > out the possibility that the 'early' neutrinos may have been
>> > > > sourced
>> > > > > > > > from some place other than CERN and that will always cause doubt.
>> > > >  If
>> > > > > > > > the scientists don't accept that, then they are as idiotic as the
>> > > > > > > > Church was when it demanded that the Sun revolve around the Earth.
>> > > > > > > > Scientists are a stubborn bunch and see that which they WANT to
>> > > > see.
>> > > > > > > > If they discover that neutrinos can consistently arrive at their
>> > > > > > > > destination faster than the speed of light, it may not upset
>> > > > Special
>> > > > > > > > Relativity at all, rather, it may provide evidence that the
>> > > > neutrinos
>> > > > > > > > are taking a short cut via a different dimension.  If so, then it
>> > > > > > > > points towards a String Theory-based universe.  As I said...we'll
>> > > > > > > > see.  I'm still publishing based on Special Relativity and my book
>> > > > > > > > explains what I've said above regarding other potential sources for
>> > > > > > > > the neutrinos.  This result begs more questions than it answers and
>> > > > > > > > THAT little fact only helps me with regard to String Theory. ;-)
>>
>> > > > > > > > >  On Oct 7, 2011 8:39 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > I'd guess they do know the origin as Cern - but they ain't sure
>> > > > > > they
>> > > > > > > > > > are neutrinos.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > On Oct 7, 2:58 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > Pat it was not a one time affair,, checked and rechecked..
>> > > > > > > > > > > it will be changing or rather challenging the concepts
>> > > > > > > > > > > Allan
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Pat <
>> > > > > > PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not think time travel is putting it correctly.
>> > > >  what I
>> > > > > > think
>> > > > > > > > > > they
>> > > > > > > > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > really saying is that there are laws beyond those that we
>> > > > > > know
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > understand today,,  they went to  extreme measures to
>> > > > verify
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > measurements Like  actually measure the speed of light to
>> > > > > > with in
>> > > > > > > > 18
>> > > > > > > > > > cm
>> > > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > make sure the calculations were correct.  like stopping
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > traffic
>> > > > > > > > > > > > though
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the trans alps tunnel so it would not interfere
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -