Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: the great attractor

Okay Neil  I will attempt to insert both feet into my mouth and explain 

Before the beginning was the Entirety in complete harmony and balance from within this harmony and balance came the beginning.

Allan

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:

Actually  I have problems with even the concept of a God particle and then I also don't I think those that think they are going to find a god particle are desperately trying to deny the existence of God,, and have little concept of who and what God is,, they are desperately trying to have a atomic being.. 

Well that is only partially possible because if you take the entirety of the universe and all the concepts people are desperately trying to create that material worlds you are only getting part of the picture because the sum total is greater than all of the parts,

Allan

PS  my artificial knee is bothering me and I am going to take a bathe to get the muscles to relax  i pulled a real bobo this morning

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:47 PM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:

Actually - there are supposed to be two god-particles - the Higgs
itself kind of needs yet another for string theories to work out.  The
size of the thingy in GeV has meaning for a whole new wad of heavy
particles if supersymmetry is right, some of which LHC might find if
the Higgs is about 125 GeV.  All as elusive as God Allan! I find
myself yearning for soul to be honest rigsy- as we apparently hurtle
towards an oblivion long after our own event horizon.

On Dec 15, 9:16 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think man humanized the Creator. I have no problem adoring a God who
> can turn raw energy into mass/matter. Isn't that the real subject of
> most prayers?
>
> On Dec 15, 1:39 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The problem is they talk about the God partical as if it is the creation or
> > beginning of God (no matter what name you give him/her/it).  There is a
> > basic problem when it comes to understanding a being that is greater than
> > the entirety of the universe (s).
>
> > This is a basic problem which at best is only glimpsed
> > Allan
> >  On Dec 15, 2011 8:25 AM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > LOL Moll!  I indeed owe a great deal to the physics that proves the
> > > space between my ears is not empty!  Physics has trouble with
> > > beginnings rigsy.  Even the big bang is more or less ruled out now -
> > > other than as an event in the continuum. My guess is that thinking
> > > implies faith - though not in old camp-fire stories.  The question
> > > always seems to be what to believe in once we have excluded the
> > > dross.  The lack of address of what the spiritual might be is sad
> > > (stripped of power issues).  We have no doubt moved closer to the
> > > Great Attractor with little sense of it,  Does this have import for
> > > what we should try to achieve in spirit?
>
> > > On Dec 14, 7:03 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thanks Molly sometimes  few words reveal amazing thought.
> > > > Allan
> > > > On Dec 14, 2011 12:27 PM, "Molly" <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > the space between your ears is infinite...internal space, that is.
>
> > > > > On Dec 12, 4:34 am, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > It's out there and it's huge (400 million light years across) and 250
> > > > > > million light years from the edge of the Milky Way.  We hurtle
> > > towards
> > > > > > it at speeds undreamed of.  This is the Great Attractor. Physics from
> > > > > > CERN is very 'small' and they might be about to tell us something
> > > > > > significant on the Higgs' boson tomorrow.  The play between 'two ends
> > > > > > of infinity' fascinates me.  I know most are more concerned with
> > > > > > colour-matching furniture and the 'tediously endless' gossip I can't
> > > > > > bear.  Dogsworth, my new canine pal, is unphased, currently 'bowing'
> > > > > > in front of the female cat - a gesture of friendship unrequited and
> > > > > > lost in translation.  We had a blood moon yesterday and he didn't
> > > even
> > > > > > howl at that, choosing instead to chase squirrels in the dawn.  I
> > > > > > called him Maxwell.  He shows little electro-magnetic imagination.
> > > > > > Max indulges my science, as long as I do it at walking pace!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

--
 (

  )

|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

--
 (

  )

|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.