Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Neil...

Of course, Allan. There have been writers with knowledge dating back
into ancient times. We shouldn't expect them to disappear at the
invention of the motion picture. Look at a lot of the old cartoons
which showed bunches of modern day inventions and technologies. The
Jetsons, for example in the technological field. Or the Wizard of Oz,
where the passing through a field of flowers put the characters to
sleep. Consider the explosion of drug addiction which followed soon
after and has 95% of the people in this country (USA) hook on
something whether prescription or not. Did you know that one can
overdose simply by walking through a poppy field? Subtle warnings is
what I call them. What better way can you think of to conceal a
matter, than to convince the populous that it doesn't exist? The few
that may not be persuaded by the non-existent standards may be
convinced that that knowledge will send them straight to hell, because
it's evil and it's devil worship.


At some point one must manage to let go of preconceived notions in
order to filter in what is new to them, in light of actuality. More
importantly, think about this: what if I am correct with the
interpretation of the Scripture, and YHVH is in the process of
exacting the demise of the modern day Babylonian System, as is clearly
prophesied? But then there is a bunch of us here banging our heads
trying to find ways to make this system work, because it is all we
know.

That would leave us praying to G_d for a few hours a day and fighting
with Him the remaining hours of that day. Wherefore, it is a good
practice to take out what is precious from what is vial in all
instances. Imagine one starving and begging for food, but demanding
that they be served off a platter of Gold, refusing to eat otherwise.
Sure, the Holy Spirits will teach all things. But there is no
knowledge to defeat the Word of YHVH. Best to understand it and get
with it, than to be done in by it.

Edward

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nothing like a good fantasy to prove a spiritual point huh, especially when
> the parties involved never existed..
> Allan
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Edward Mason <masonedward058@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> You were doing great, Vam, until you got here:
>>
>> "Access to our spiritual content is to be attained, worked for.
>> But since its fruits are not phenomenal, it is worthless for
>> anyone with worldly aims, material goals or physical priority."
>>
>> At this point something must have happened. This statement is
>> basically true; People don't want to exert the necessary time and\or
>> effort to attain this ability. Notwithstanding the efforts by of those
>> who benefit most when the masses remain ignorant.
>>
>> Still, technically the statement contains vital errors; i.e.; (1)- The
>> fruits 'are' phenomenal! And can be viewed as the experiments play out
>> in practical terms of manifestation. Though many great experiments
>> have extended periods of manifestation. Did you watch the movie
>> "Aurthur"? Notice that it took Merlin six months to exact an
>> experiment to get the King in the bed of his enemy's wife, and how the
>> writers tried the show the development by practical means. (2) Look at
>> the world's governments and religious establishments and know that the
>> fruits are very beneficial to some seeking to acquire physical and
>> material gain. So we can read the warning in the bible, " I gave them
>> space to repent but they continued with their sorceries, witch crafts,
>> and murders."
>>
>> Edward
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Molly <mollyb363@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I think it is a wonderful model.  Simple and elegant.  Not unlike the
>> > kundalini model of the integrated chakras, that unite higher and
>> > lower, crown and root, etc., in the heart with a spiral (of life).
>> > Happy new year, my friend.  Love your blog posts. Had good seats to
>> > see Jethro Tull play a few times in my day. Stay warm.
>> >
>> > On Dec 25, 9:19 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> It's early morning here... and cold. Colder than London, Dublin and
>> >> Edinburgh ! We do not have a heating system and I have not installed a
>> >> geyser. But the upside is that we can afford the best of green tea,
>> >> two pots as the morning picks up. Evenings are invariably raised on
>> >> vodka and nights capped with a cup of coffee.
>> >>
>> >> The picture in terms of sheaths is to be " seen " in one's experience,
>> >> immediately... as content of our being, existence, and not as peels
>> >> that an onion may be reduced !
>> >>
>> >> ( A )  the Physical ... including two sheaths, Gross and Vital
>> >> content, of our being.
>> >>
>> >> ( B )  the Mental ... including two sheaths, Mind and Intellect
>> >> content, of our being.
>> >>
>> >> ( C )  the Spiritual ... contained, and concealed, in the Bliss
>> >> sheath.
>> >>
>> >> There is a continuity that can be seen... all along the axis...
>> >> from Matter to the Self, moving on from the Material Space
>> >> in which the body is objectively situated, as one among others,
>> >>
>> >> to the Mental Space where terms of objectivity like " extension "
>> >> " mass " " weight " and " count " are without any real meaning,
>> >> consequence or worth. The phenomena here is SEEN subjectively,
>> >> felt as emotion interfacing with vitality in the physical space,
>> >> understood as thought which emotions evoke,
>> >> as idea which cumulative thoughts from.
>> >> and as knowledge when an idea abides over the long term.
>> >>
>> >> The Spiritual Space has content that are normally closed,
>> >> unless joy characterises our natural disposition
>> >> and happiness becomes the ground state.
>> >> And that is rather rather rare.
>> >>
>> >> Access to our spiritual content is to be attained, worked for.
>> >> But since its fruits are not phenomenal, it is worthless for
>> >> anyone with worldly aims, material goals or physical priority.
>> >>
>> >> On Dec 25, 2:09 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > I have been thinking about it and sheath is a very good word to use.
>> >> > What
>> >> > Vam wrote does not waste words.  ...  it does contain ideas other
>> >> > than
>> >> > mine,  probably because I have never needed to ask and just accepted
>> >> > the
>> >> > concept as truth, the latter part is excellent, some of it I simply
>> >> >  have
>> >> > not thought through yet.
>> >>
>> >> > It is very interesting. I like looking at ideas concerning God by
>> >> > what ever
>> >> > name as long as they are not trying to sell me a bill of goods.
>> >>
>> >> > Neil you have been a good boy I presume and not packing contraband
>> >> > through
>> >> > the mountains?
>> >> > Allan
>> >> > On Dec 25, 2011 1:01 AM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
>

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário