Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: What is Faster, Speed of Light or Speed of Thought?

Molly says stimuli can be learned to be ignored when they don't lead you the heightened awareness that you are promised to experience in the non-dual world. Of course she would never say this in direct response to your comment as it could be interpreted as a conflict and conflicts remind too much of long surpassed duality. Which brings us back to what I'd call ignorance, but in a negative sense. Whereas she means only the best. I find things can be very simple if one can refrain from the urge to want to unify everything. In the long run it's also faster, by the way.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 4:01 PM, rigsy03 <rigsy03@yahoo.com> wrote:

There are the sub-liminal and autonomic as constants. Flu symptons
cannot be ignored- nor a sneeze- etc. Sexual alerts are another case.
Dreams. True, the brain wakes up and makes decisions- large and small-
but might mistake the issue/reality afterall. It varies with
receptivity- Mozart/notes; Milton & Shakespeare/words and so on- it's
kind of a heightened awareness.

On Dec 18, 5:12 am, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hm, this linear stimulus-response thing is not so popular here in
> continental Europe any more, but I hear it's still widely seen as the
> networking physics of the chaos you describe. Whereas I'd view myself as a
> constant who decides upon the stimuli I want to interact with, knowing that
> this is one perspective. But most likely I got you definition of stimulii
> being constant wrong.
>
>
>

> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Stimulii is constant but is separated into various channels such as
> > thinking, the sub-cs. realm, emotions, sensations, memories, etc.. I
> > get interested in the way humans sort through all of this and how
> > stimulii overlap, affect, screw up, etc. Not very original, as it is a
> > popular theme.
>
> > On Dec 16, 4:16 am, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It's the thinking potential which makes the speed of thought appear
> > faster
> > > than the speed of light, maybe.
>
> > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Tim Smith <smithtim...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > This one time I was sitting in mt Physics class and listening on how
> > > > my teacher was telling me that the only way we could travel long
> > > > distances was thru speed of light or something, and I thought to
> > > > myself well that's kind of interesting, but is speed of light really
> > > > the fastest matter or a thing that can actually travel the fastest in
> > > > this universe. So I thought to myself, what could be faster then speed
> > > > of light, and for some reason this idea came up to  me and actually
> > > > being the answer to my question, could speed of thought be one of
> > them?- Hide quoted text -
>

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -