speak of God except in very informal group."
On Jan 23, 8:58 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good, RP...
>
> I do not know of God, his choices or his choicelessness. And I do
> speak of God except in very informal group.
>
> If I must share my belief of God... he is everything, forms and
> formless, and more.
>
> Does that seem like a portrait ?
>
> On Jan 22, 9:24 pm, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Vam , since you know that God has choices you also know what they are
> > and can delineate them. To me God is formless, but you would surely be
> > able to draw up a portrait.
>
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What you wrote, RP, was ridiculous. It you I found to be funny.
>
> > > I don't see why God's choices have to be of a kind and scale that
> > > preoccupies you.
>
> > > You would be hard put at defining, or drawing up a portrait of, the
> > > God you speak of with such aplomb ! And then you presume to know of
> > > his choices !! Or, worse, his choicelessness !!!
>
> > > On Jan 21, 1:04 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> A man jumps from a plane without a parachute and when he reaches a
> > >> great velocity God exercises His choice and drastically slows his
> > >> fall. Funny Vam , isn't it ? Again God exercises His choice and
> > >> cancels all His laws and there is mayhem ! Or better still , at times
> > >> there are laws and at times there are none. God keeps on exercising
> > >> His choice and man keeps on playing the fool , he doesn't get wet in
> > >> the pool and doesn't get burned in the fire. Imagine a world without
> > >> God's laws , a world in which He keeps on exercising His choice.
>
> > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > A choiceless God is shite...
> > >> > So there goes all such pontification !
>
> > >> > #DeepakMRanade's article "Uncovering Relative Truths"
> > >> > in @timesofindia neatly summarises the approach to Advaita,
> > >> > its conceptual layout. You are invited to discover the answers.
>
> > >> >http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=...
>
> > >> > On Jan 19, 10:21 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Interesting RP. I'm atheist only in that I reject stories that are
> > >> >> full of holes, talking snakes and such. The Gnostics have it that
> > >> >> creation was a mistake - though I have no means to determine any truth
> > >> >> in this I am struck most argument can be undercut like this. I often
> > >> >> wonder what might explain why we don't just know what life is about
> > >> >> and how this might be explained.
>
> > >> >> On Jan 19, 10:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > I as a human have the choice , even if it is apparent and not real ,
> > >> >> > to do this or do that , that is, there is an element of uncertainty in
> > >> >> > my actions , but God has a steadfastness of purpose. God's will is
> > >> >> > sure and certain , the whole space-time continuum emanates from Him
> > >> >> > without any active choice on His part which raises the question of
> > >> >> > responsibility. God cannot be held responsible for any event as it
> > >> >> > happens without any wavering on His part , He has no choice and hence
> > >> >> > cannot be held responsible. This brings us to the question of
> > >> >> > worship , why worship a Being who has a fixed purpose ? In that case ,
> > >> >> > even though believing in a supreme Being and determinism , I can be
> > >> >> > called an atheist.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário