Re: Mind's Eye Re: i see

Manufacturing in the US would have added $40 to the cost of Apple
stuff. My neighbours' youngest (13) has an i-Phone and teases our dog
with its dog whistle app - its main use as far as I can see.

On Feb 3, 12:51 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Apple and its sweatshops? Do you realize most of our exports to China
> has been scrap? Probably the soles on your slippers are recycled
> electric cords. Of course, Apple is so cool- who cares? Tra-la...
>
> On Jan 26, 3:47 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The problem with competing is cheating bastards Don.  Even a level
> > playing field is a handicap to those of us who play every week on the
> > side of a wind-blown mud heap on the side of a hill.  I think the sods
> > who exported our manufacturing are traitors and about as moral as
> > someone selling whiskey and guns to the Indians.  The economics touted
> > by our politicians reminds me of talking to mad people before you
> > realise they are out of it.
>
> > On Jan 24, 1:55 am, Don Johnson <daj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Me neither Kenny, me neither. Thing about jobs is they don't  exist to keep
> > > us all making money. They exist to provide a service or build a product. In
> > > the case of the Iphone China gets the jobs of making the product. As a
> > > direct result of our economic policies it's simply impossible for the U.S.
> > > to manufacture these nifty devices here in the States. Innovation and
> > > progress would stall if the focus changed from providing services to
> > > keeping alive outdated jobs. We need a regulation revolution in this
> > > country to compete. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
>
> > > dj
>
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:19 PM, kenny <goatsrrun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > problem is, is that the people entrusted to see that this, or any new,
> > > > technology won't negativaly effect us, are probably not oing their
> > > > jobs right, and get paid way too much money which is y they ain't
> > > > doing their jobs right. just a thought. idk much about nething
>
> > > > On Jan 23, 9:57 am, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > We all claimed to come in Wendy's in days of tales from behind the
> > > > > bike sheds Kenny.  I'm all for technology taking over work - the
> > > > > problem being income distribution.  Eye candy is as fictional as any
> > > > > hologram and no doubt produces sexual diabetes.
>
> > > > > On Jan 23, 2:42 am, kenny <goatsrrun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > that this i phone holographic technology stuff will whiz up everywhere
> > > > > > soon. the fast food billboards will soo be images coming up from a
> > > > > > projector implanted in the ground. changing, moving images. and hell.
> > > > > > add some speakers too. "come to wendy's" says a voice behind the
> > > > > > wendy's girl image that you can walk through. i said something of this
> > > > > > nature to my friend and all he said was something about how it's gonna
> > > > > > just take our jobs.... i don't need that fancy shit. i'll keep my job
> > > > > > for a lil bit of eye candy.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -