Re: Mind's Eye Creation

As an natural observation it is reasonable to devise cyclic measure
from periods between events, given that it has been highly reliable.
Where the measure hasn't we can just refine another dimension and
linear time is reliable again. Not sure if we've had a need
technically to pursue more than two dimensions, I'm sure Pat could
correct me on this and my terminology (which I throw about loosely). I
personally think of time as action rate of interacting energies of
varying density with more strongly determined pathways (of least
resistance) like lightning branches being squeezed through a
constriction in the present time and branching out at varying strength
into the past and future, mostly in balance. But leave it to me to
wrap up a completely subjective view in a cluster-flock of pseudo
technical ideas. :p

On 4/12/12, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually the only time that exist is the present "The hand of time writes
> and haven written moves on"
>
> There are people that feel time does not even exist.
> Allan
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, pol.science kid
> <r.freebird@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> To be very short.. i dont understand where time past goes.... is it there?
>> .... i cant .. i have tried to understand.. i am not able to... what is
>> time lapsing into.. or what is lapsing?... leave out memory... its our
>> memory that gives this linear impression.. how does someone without
>> memory.. feel time? ... can we concieve of any being without memory
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:24 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> At this particular moment my universe is in a certain stage and
>>> infinite parallel universes are in their respective stages , to me
>>> time is a sense of elapsing but how you define time is not clear ,
>>> would you care to elucidate ?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:29 PM, pol.science kid <r.freebird@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Pat explained to me once that there is little possibility of a parallel
>>> > universe.. he said it would be waste of energy.. though i cant be
>>> exactly
>>> > sure of what he said... I cant explain as well as him... How would you
>>> > explain time in parallel universes..
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:45 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> It is logical to think that at any given moment there are infinite no.
>>> of
>>> >> universes in parallel, and when an universe disintegrates it vanishes
>>> into
>>> >> nothingness along with the space in which it subsists. That is , space
>>> is
>>> >> not permanent but only part of the universe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > EverComing
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> EverComing
>>
>
>
>
> --
> (
> )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>

--
Please do not put me on forwarding lists or submit my address to cute
online greetings or anything else for that matter. If you must, please
forward me in BCC and send me a link to cute greetings. Many thanks!