Re: Mind's Eye Creation

NASA has come up with an onboard clock to allow navigation 'without
phoning home'. The development of clocks is associated with
terrestrial navigation needs. Had the French had decent ones towards
the end of the 18th century they would not have turned left too soon
and landed in Ireland and English may have become a very minor
language. I rather regret our lack of decent cafe society. The
enormity of creation is - well enormous. My own sense of it isn't
very technical. I suspect focus on origin may be a mistake and the
quest may concern what we can become.

On Apr 13, 12:45 am, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> timeless
>
> On Apr 12, 2:33 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Actually the only time that exist is the present "The hand of time writes
> > and haven written  moves on"
>
> > There are people that feel time does not even exist.
> > Allan
>
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > To be very short.. i dont understand where time past goes.... is it there?
> > > .... i cant .. i have tried to understand.. i am not able to... what is
> > > time lapsing into.. or what is lapsing?... leave out memory... its our
> > > memory that gives this linear impression.. how does someone without
> > > memory.. feel time? ... can we concieve of any being without memory
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:24 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> At this particular moment my universe is in a certain stage and
> > >> infinite parallel universes are in their respective stages , to me
> > >> time is a sense of elapsing but how you define time is not clear ,
> > >> would you care to elucidate ?
>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:29 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Pat explained to me once that there is little possibility of a parallel
> > >> > universe.. he said it would be waste of energy.. though i cant be
> > >> exactly
> > >> > sure of what he said... I cant explain as well as him...  How would you
> > >> > explain time in parallel universes..
>
> > >> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:45 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> It is logical to think that at any given moment there are infinite no.
> > >> of
> > >> >> universes in parallel, and when an universe disintegrates it vanishes
> > >> into
> > >> >> nothingness along with the space in which it subsists. That is , space
> > >> is
> > >> >> not permanent but only part of the universe.
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > EverComing
>
> > > --
> > > EverComing
>
> > --
> >  (
> >   )
> > |_D Allan
>
> > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.