Re: Mind's Eye Re: Question

Sorry Rigsy..  Gore was never a mad man looking for a war to make him great.. all Bush ever wanted was to be was a great war time president just like his father..  he already had all the proper personal already in place including a republican majority that he could get to pass anything with out conscious..,, 
Sorry Rigsy november 9th was just an excuses..  and he and the republican party took the nation to war based on lies ...
Allan

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, rigsy03 <rigsy03@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yellow journalism and Hoover secret files existed before Bush43,
Allan- not to mention the Star Chamber of the Tudors. I could have
some fun with this- from the gossip circling the ancient water wells
onwards. It may be one of our indelible human traits- curiousity and
malice.//Since our agencies "missed the boat" re 9-11, what do you
think a Pres. Gore would have done in the same situation?//There is a
myth about America and its freedoms for citizens. It is
misunderstood...and abused. Thankfully, we have a Supreme Court that
can check the cheek of Congress and the Excutive Branch. :-) There is
another subject- is our Constitution out-dated and should it be
revised esp when we are attempting to market it to the world as the
only acceptable model for governance? Are our elections becoming a
nasty form of "American Idol"? Do we trust the majority?

On Apr 6, 9:22 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the governments do not give a damn about your privacy,,   ever since your
> buddies the republicans and Bush got the homeland security act passed.. you
> have no rights at all; zero, none. As an american you no longer have any
> rights.. sorry rigsy you sold the boat..
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:36 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > That's my routine also- a separate e-mail for real people, real life.
> > The use of screen names has undercut certain aspects of the internet-
> > some reasonable, others not. But no one quibbles about Mark Twain or
> > George Sand, etc.. or code names for military or spy operations. The
> > veracity of an opinion does not really depend on a real or invented
> > name, does it? The fact remains. The legal aspects of identification,
> > criminal charges, etc. must make fake names a nightmare for
> > investigators but surveillance seems to be constantly improving until
> > the other side of the issue is protection of privacy. Another issue is
> > context and intent.
>
> > On Apr 6, 2:23 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Poly you are not missing much in my opinion. All though I do have a gmail
> > > account using my real name it is for family use ad hey are not
> > connected..
> > > but looking at freebird  sound like a variation of angry birds..  I used
> > to
> > > have one on deheretic  no problems till I killed it due to dis like.. and
> > > they offered it to me..pre introduction..
>
> > > You might try being creative    the name on the deheretic accout was Iam
> > > Heretic
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:54 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > Allan i was on google plus.. but in a few months i got a notification
> > that
> > > > my name was not against their names policy.. they wanted a proper
> > name....
> > > > then in two weeks they suspended my profile.. now i cant get google
> > plus
> > > > unless i change my name.. and if i do .. i have to use that name for
> > all my
> > > > google accounts....
>
> > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> Not really poly all you need is a gmail account.   A little creativity
> > > >> will get you the account
> > > >> Google+ is no a favorite.
> > > >> Allan
> > > >> On Apr 5, 2012 1:52 PM, "pol.science kid" <r.freeb...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > >>> I hate google plus, they they want a 'real name' and put it
> > > >>> everywhere..... what if some persons real name is whacky.. then..
> > would
> > > >>> they still deny access.....
>
> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Ash <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >>>> Just poking in here, noticed my old name is back since I'm trying
> > out
> > > >>>> google's new groups browser. I am still pondering a decent response
> > to
> > > >>>> malcymo's free will post, slowly. Any news?
>
> > > >>>> -J
>
> > > >>>> On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 2:36:50 PM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> > > >>>>> So where are you going Neil and when will you be back?
> > > >>>>> Allan
>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>>  (
> > > >>>>>   )
> > > >>>>> |_D Allan
>
> > > >>>>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> EverComing
>
> > > > --
> > > > EverComing
>
> > > --
> > >  (
> > >   )
> > > |_D Allan
>
> > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -



--
 (
  )
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.



0 comentários:

Postar um comentário