Re: Mind's Eye Re: Thinking Earth

Then there's gender, oh boy, and if one gets the
political-correctness-obtuse feeling there are the races where you
cannot tell the difference between gender! (rotten cabbage flinging ensues)

On 7/2/2012 2:12 PM, Allan H wrote:
> The Chinese history has shown to be able to sustain a culture for
> millennium with little change. That is their ' gift ' of race.
> Allan
>
> On Jul 2, 2012 2:58 PM, "Lee Douglas" <leerevdouglas@gmail.com
> <mailto:leerevdouglas@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Except of course the is only one race, and soo to say the Chiese
> race makes no sense at all. Why not say the Chinese peoples? As to
> the Caucasion peoples, I'll assume that you mean these differances
> are cultural so exactly which caucasion peoples do you mean?
> On Saturday, 30 June 2012 07:59:07 UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>
> I read some where the traits if the different races. (memory
> probably failing ) said the greatest trait if the oriental race
> was one of sustaining a culture for centuries, the Caucasian
> race is one scientific development and creative thinking,
> Some how I get the feeling the assessment was right. A friend of
> mine who works for the Chinese are always cheating and stealing
> with their business practice being something else.
> Allan
>
> On Jun 30, 2012 2:25 AM, "Molly" <mollyb363@gmail.com
> <mailto:mollyb363@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> and valor.
>
> On Jun 29, 8:02 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > China is up to mischief all over. They are using mineral
> near-
> > monopolies against WTO regs. They steal intellectual
> property. They
> > channel stuff to make their economy seem t work. They
> and others are
> > attacking the petro-eurodollar. The Germans have
> probably manipulated
> > the Euro. Britain is the hub of every disgusting
> financial practice
> > imaginable. Top universities invest alumni funds in
> schemes like the
> > old Scottish Enclosures.The world lacks charm rigs!
> >
> > On Jun 29, 10:13 pm, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Maybe the universal draft should be reinstated- for men
> and women-
> > > ages 18-20 with reserve duties. Since the military is
> so high tech we
> > > really don't need the manpower there but could use it
> in other areas
> > > of service. This youth and the older protestors are
> re-living the
> > > '60"s. Or trying to. They have also grown up in an era
> of unearned
> > > entitlements which ruins character.
> >
> > > I don't know about post war prosperity- everyone who
> won was broke. We
> > > bounced back first because the country had not been
> bombed to pieces
> > > are we were geared up for manufacture and a huge pent
> up consumer
> > > hunger. The following wars are just what Eisenhower
> warned us of- the
> > > military-industrial complex that has worn us out and
> depleted the
> > > treasury.
> >
> > > I find it strange with all our military know-how we
> cannot detect
> > > roadside bombs and suicide bombers.
> >
> > > China has kept out of mischief to build and trade.
> Russia has only
> > > reacted to political or terrorist mischief. But both
> make and deal
> > > weapons.
> >
> > > On Jun 28, 10:50 pm, Don Johnson <daj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:33 AM, rigsy03
> <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > Yes- that Patton.//I'll be dead in 30 years.// I
> like characters who
> > > > > don't fit "the mold"- though I know they are
> usually asking for big
> > > > > trouble. At any rate- back to warfare- there are
> field battles and now
> > > > > we prefer high tech drones, special forces,
> economic sanctions, etc.
> > > > > What are you suggesting? Do you have an
> alternative? Oh yes- there's
> > > > > world peace and prosperity...
> >
> > > > Didn't mean you personally Rigs I was referring to
> today's young men.
> > > > Today's computer game playing, food stamp getting,
> gimmie my share
> > > > Occupiers that would rather complain then go out and
> get a job. Those
> > > > guys. Plus I still can't get over the Brony
> phenomenon. This
> > > > Metro-Sexual thing is getting outta hand. IMHO.
> >
> > > > World Peace and Prosperity. That's what happens in
> between huge wars.
> > > > Watching China and Russia jockey for postion as the
> next Superpowers
> > > > is depressing me.
> >
> > > > dj
> >
> > > > > On Jun 28, 5:19 am, Don Johnson <daj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Don Johnson
> <daj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > You mean this Patton?
> >
> > > > >> > Ah, but we've come a long way since this, eh?
> Now, in 30 years when
> > > > >> > you're sitting by your fireside with your
> grandchildren on you're knee
> > > > >> > you can tell them you sat out WWIII watching My
> Little Pony reruns on
> > > > >> > The Hub.
> >
> > > > >> > dj
> >
> > > > >>http://www.youtube.com/__watch?v=nCHGCNbntS0
> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCHGCNbntS0>
> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:20 PM, rigsy03
> <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >> That might work in a restaurant...
> >
> > > > >> >> And what's this American bit? You mean when we
> arrived we explained
> > > > >> >> our long range plans to the Indians? Etc.
> Hitler, then, would be
> > > > >> >> admirable?
> >
> > > > >> >> Yes- I like Patton and his type. Like Mencken.
> Many others.
> > > > >> >> However...some zero in and others circle and it
> really depends on many
> > > > >> >> factors. I have found most do not like to hear
> critical truths and
> > > > >> >> furthermore many subjects are avoided in social
> groups lest someone's
> > > > >> >> feelings are aroused or group unity is
> threatened. Depending on the
> > > > >> >> situation and risk, sometimes discretion is the
> better course (for
> > > > >> >> instance, to spare the impact upon your
> children as a minor example;
> > > > >> >> violence or war being more extreme cases).
> >
> > > > >> >> But I like you better now that I know you can
> say you are sorry- I
> > > > >> >> find that beautiful about you.
> >
> > > > >> >> On Jun 27, 10:42 am, Vam
> <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >>> I am sorry, Molly.
> >
> > > > >> >>> I am very sorry, Malcymo.
> >
> > > > >> >>> It was a very poor job of pulling your leg out
> of that constant
> > > > >> >>> apologetic and self-abnegating crouch your
> posts project you as. It's
> > > > >> >>> very un-American... ref to that very admirable
> quality of putting
> > > > >> >>> things direct and stating matters without
> diffidence.
> >
> > > > >> >>> Come on man. F... who knows what and who does not.
> > > > >> >>> Let's put it on table : both our answers and
> questions, in truth,
> > > > >> >>> without preamble or defensive explanations.
> >
> > > > >> >>> On Jun 27, 4:47 pm, Molly
> <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > Why such agitation, Vam? The group is not
> going to exist without
> > > > >> >>> > common respect, you of all should understand
> that.
> >
> > > > >> >>> > On Jun 26, 8:28 am, Vam
> <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > Malcymo... what is your son's idols ?
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > I believe you don't know a shit. If you
> did, you would have enjoyed
> > > > >> >>> > > entertaining us !
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > On Jun 26, 2:36 pm, malcymo
> <malc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > Feynman, I have always wanted to take
> him on board. He is, I believe, one
> > > > >> >>> > > > of my son's idols.
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:44:57 PM
> UTC+12, Ash wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > Speaking of Feynman, the famous
> Cornell lecture series, which might be
> > > > >> >>> > > > > quite on topic:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > >
> >http://research.microsoft.__com/apps/tools/tuva/index.__html#data=3%7Cd71. <http://research.microsoft.com/apps/tools/tuva/index.html#data=3%7Cd71.>..
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > Haven't had time to watch much but he
> did integrate a lot of humor.
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > On 6/25/2012 7:22 AM, Molly wrote:
> > > > >> >>> > > > > > Not sure Richard Feynman would have
> agreed, but ok. Quantum computing
> > > > >> >>> > > > > > is still being poineered
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > > On Jun 25, 4:23 am, Allan
> H<allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> lol Now we know what you spend
> your time pondering while you roam the
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> jungles 6 months at a time..
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> They are not imaginary but rather
> real as you can show the effect.
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> But you must remember americans
> have not reached the A0, A1, A2, A4 ,,
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Their math is still stuck in the
> archaic age of paper.
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Allan
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> On Jun 25, 2012 8:52 AM,
> "malcymo"<malc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> A couple of short mathematical
> poems for you all:-
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> *Uniformity*
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> The ratio 'one by root two'****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Has powerful acclaim****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> For should one divide one by two****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> The ratio remains****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> This simple fact made foolscap die****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> And paper size mundane.****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> 'A0', 'A1', 'A2', 'A4'****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> When folded look the same.
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> *Numbers Imaginary*
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> * *
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> That damned square root of minus
> one****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Does not exist or so they say****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> So let's imagine that it does****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> And give it a name, Call it 'j'.****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> ** **
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> For 'j' to have reality****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Real things it then must do for me****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> If not it will simply remain,****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Imaginary in fact and name.****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> ** **
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> 'j' squared times one is minus one****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> A vector rotation of pi****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> So by itself, what must it do,****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> A vector rotation of pi over two?
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> Just sharing, Malc****
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> On Monday, 25 June 2012 17:27:47
> UTC+12, rigsy03 wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> That definitely is geometrical
> but can get very complicated- it's
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> great if it falls into place
> naturally or easily on a crude 3:5 or
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> 5:8. The Japanese diagonals are a
> lure- always- so I get into a
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> scramble sometimes- but that's
> back to perspective. Anyway, this
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> figure is in trouble- it might be
> 10 years ago I started it- maybe
> > > > >> >>> > > > > 15.
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> Am starting to call her Dizzy
> Mona. :-)
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> On Jun 23, 11:53 pm,
> malcymo<malc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> And to think that some
> mathematical ratios are also aesthetically
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> beautiful. I am thinking of the
> Golden Ratio in art and the most
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> delightful
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> aspect ratio for a picture or TV
> screen.
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> On Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:26:15
> AM UTC+12, pol.science kid wrote:
> >
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> I came accross this article
> mentioning the fibbonacci series... and
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> the mathematical patterns in
> nature.. then i wikied it... there
> > > > >> >>> > > > > were
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> too many concepts for me to
> grasp cos i am not familiar with math
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>> that
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> much(i feel now i should do
> something about it).. it was really
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> amazing for me... specific
> patterns.. in precison.. makes you
> > > > >> >>> > > > > wonder
> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> whether after there is a MIND
> that contains us... and whether there
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »
>

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário