For once rigsy I don't think you grasp any of the point. I certainly
don't want to see the public sector running the private sector. We
mostly nationalised over here because the private sector wasn't
working and it's difficult to find evidence that privatisation has
worked. I use Andrew's 'Monopoly' to explain the focus on finance.
Most of it is unnecessary and at odds with the cost-cutting of
efficient business. It's also a form of taxation without
representation. About 92,000 people own most of the Earth. You are
right, of course, that democracy is something we have wrong.
Pr[T < 1 T < 1] = O, O - 1 (F (1), O -1 (F(1), y would be the Gaussian
copula derivatives trading is based on if I had the right symbols. It
was produced by Dr Li who is back in China. It's nonsense as science
- what we call a scalar in maths. Joseph Farrell even suggests it
might be a red plot in 'Babylon's Banksters'. The maths is churned
out like religious liturgy and yet is as flawed as working out our
weekly budgets using income we make up rather than receive. It's
alchemy.
On 1 Sep, 21:36, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What makes you think the public sector can run the private sector? As
> in the past, the two are often in oppostion. Again, just make some
> historical substitutions.
>
> There are systems of meritocracy that work. The military is one
> example but there are others. Merit is not always measured by
> financial gain.
>
> Wealth can only buy "so much" of an advantage- the rest is up to
> character.
>
> The private sector probably works harder because they can see/use the
> rewards whereas the public sector is hamstrung and dependent on others/
> policy/elections. (Rat/mouse experiments.)
>
> What is misunderstood is the concept of Democracy- which was a very
> controlled system in ancient Greece. America has become the symbol of
> Democracy but there is much misunderstanding about individual and
> group rights. We offer the opportunity to suceed which is not the same
> as a free ride.
>
> Who has set up the systems that control personal/national finances?
> Sometimes individuals but usually with the permission and regulation
> of the government- which was once controlled by the Papacy, for
> instance, and some may now be controlled by Islam or other strict
> "isms".
>
> "Rents" are the price one pays to live in a society. (Even apps are
> leased and cannot be transferred.)
>
> At any rate, few systems survive with an empty treasury/debts that
> soar above GDP.
>
> If voters want to be dazzled rather than directed they will continue
> to vote for entertainers rather than managers.
>
> On Sep 1, 7:35 am, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > A common phrase in my childhood when we couldn't understand something
> > was 'it's all Greek to me'. Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are all
> > Euro periphery nations now on the brink of collapse. I've been trying
> > to explain what's going on in a series of lectures recently. I start
> > from the premise that economics is all Greek to me. This is some
> > combination of me not understanding the muck and my belief that what
> > it's all about is a politburo imposing the Greek fate on us all.
> > Michael Hudson has written extensively on this.
>
> > Most of us can't debate economics because we can't get our attitudes
> > out of the Idols that generate our 'understanding'. I usually start
> > with a few questions about debt and what money is. It's rare anyone
> > has much sensible to say on either, let alone knowledge of the history
> > on might find in, say, David Graeber's 'Debt: the first 5000 years' or
> > Paul Ormerod's 'Dr Strangelove's Game'. I veer off a little and
> > explain that when I started university teaching, you could base a
> > course on text like this aiming at truth than than quantitative
> > manipulation. These days, education has shifted towards producing
> > technocrats with instantly transferable job skills. Teaching doesn't
> > get much further than compiling and manipulating spreadsheets.
>
> > Ask yourself who owns the debt, what is its size in comparison with
> > the productive economy. The answers are startling, but less so than
> > the general ignorance in which we have been educated not to know. I
> > test the latter with a bit of computerised button-pushing before I
> > start.
>
> > The debt is several times the productive economy - or rather the
> > consuming economy. It's owned, in the main, by a small number of
> > people through stock markets and bonds (bonds are much bigger than
> > shares these days). As few as 92,000 people own most of it around the
> > world. These are the politburo or alien lizards who run the show.
>
> > I venture off into some Thorstein Veblen and a book on Germany and the
> > world wars by an Italian - 'Conjuring Hitler'. This is really to show
> > that current economics isn't new at all. I run through some economic
> > modelling and then ask what results we'd get if we designed our
> > spreadsheets from history rather than theory, including a turn on
> > delta, gamma and Poisson leap hedging.
>
> > My last question is 'where did the money go'? You see, all the
> > spreadsheets work, but they don't show what money is or where it ends
> > up. Something called the Cantillon effect helps here. Money is
> > effectively 'radioactive' and the plan worldwide Greek. We cut
> > schools, police and welfare services and the money goes to a rich
> > oligarchy who fund our politics, destroying the hope of democracy.
> > Viewed as a physical system, economics is a control system that uses
> > more resources in control than in production. We don't go for this in
> > science, except in highly complex experiments as at CERN and
> > Fermilab. The essence of economics is a plot by a government of he
> > rich to own everything and rent it back to us. This is the essential
> > Greek model.
>
> > It's easy enough to get to this stage. The arguments can be made very
> > accurately. This is only stage one. Underlying the argument are the
> > Idols - complex soaked-up collective ignorance that actually prevent
> > economics as a science and our recognition that finance is a
> > complicated, religious control fraud (Veblen comes free on the Net).
>
> > Lecture two starts with the question 'what is our evidence that
> > private sector disciplines work better than the public sector and if
> > so, why is the private sector so interested in running the public
> > sector rather than producing radical, innovative, better
> > alternatives'? This is something of a Wittgensteinian turn as I think
> > organisation itself is misunderstood in private versus public sector
> > debate. Underlying this is the ideology of meritocracy and its
> > contradictions that money buys unfair advantage and wealth results in
> > rents the rest of us pay.
>
> > Is your country turning Greek?
--
About Me
- Dulce
Blog Archive
- setembro 2024 (1)
- junho 2024 (1)
- abril 2024 (1)
- março 2024 (3)
- fevereiro 2024 (7)
- janeiro 2024 (5)
- dezembro 2023 (12)
- novembro 2023 (21)
- outubro 2023 (14)
- setembro 2023 (34)
- agosto 2023 (22)
- julho 2023 (112)
- junho 2023 (66)
- maio 2023 (52)
- abril 2023 (81)
- março 2023 (72)
- fevereiro 2023 (64)
- janeiro 2023 (44)
- dezembro 2022 (21)
- novembro 2022 (54)
- outubro 2022 (79)
- setembro 2022 (103)
- agosto 2022 (133)
- julho 2022 (96)
- junho 2022 (1)
- fevereiro 2022 (2)
- dezembro 2021 (1)
- novembro 2021 (1)
- outubro 2021 (31)
- setembro 2021 (71)
- fevereiro 2021 (6)
- janeiro 2021 (9)
- dezembro 2020 (1)
- julho 2020 (2)
- junho 2020 (12)
- maio 2020 (1)
- abril 2020 (15)
- março 2020 (13)
- fevereiro 2020 (4)
- setembro 2019 (12)
- agosto 2019 (28)
- julho 2019 (42)
- abril 2019 (10)
- março 2019 (48)
- fevereiro 2019 (207)
- janeiro 2019 (64)
- dezembro 2018 (3)
- novembro 2018 (1)
- outubro 2018 (2)
- junho 2018 (2)
- maio 2018 (1)
- novembro 2017 (3)
- outubro 2017 (2)
- setembro 2017 (2)
- julho 2017 (2)
- junho 2017 (6)
- maio 2017 (12)
- abril 2017 (3)
- março 2017 (1)
- fevereiro 2017 (3)
- novembro 2016 (4)
- agosto 2016 (1)
- julho 2016 (4)
- junho 2016 (4)
- maio 2016 (1)
- outubro 2015 (9)
- setembro 2015 (5)
- julho 2015 (5)
- junho 2015 (3)
- maio 2015 (98)
- abril 2015 (256)
- março 2015 (1144)
- fevereiro 2015 (808)
- janeiro 2015 (470)
- dezembro 2014 (322)
- novembro 2014 (249)
- outubro 2014 (361)
- setembro 2014 (218)
- agosto 2014 (93)
- julho 2014 (163)
- junho 2014 (61)
- maio 2014 (90)
- abril 2014 (45)
- março 2014 (119)
- fevereiro 2014 (71)
- janeiro 2014 (97)
- dezembro 2013 (95)
- novembro 2013 (182)
- outubro 2013 (79)
- setembro 2013 (99)
- agosto 2013 (139)
- julho 2013 (98)
- junho 2013 (185)
- maio 2013 (332)
- abril 2013 (99)
- março 2013 (102)
- fevereiro 2013 (231)
- janeiro 2013 (264)
- dezembro 2012 (361)
- novembro 2012 (396)
- outubro 2012 (265)
- setembro 2012 (316)
- agosto 2012 (362)
- julho 2012 (163)
- junho 2012 (332)
- maio 2012 (167)
- abril 2012 (165)
- março 2012 (156)
- fevereiro 2012 (246)
- janeiro 2012 (332)
- dezembro 2011 (348)
- novembro 2011 (176)
- outubro 2011 (147)
- setembro 2011 (378)
- agosto 2011 (222)
- julho 2011 (31)
- junho 2011 (37)
- maio 2011 (27)
- abril 2011 (26)
- março 2011 (49)
- fevereiro 2011 (36)
- janeiro 2011 (42)
- dezembro 2010 (49)
- novembro 2010 (46)
- outubro 2010 (23)
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário