Re: Mind's Eye Re: Life

On 18 Oct, 22:25, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is WE - you and I each - who has need of ethics, so that we know how to
> think, assess and act at situations we face and live through.
>
> I always clarifies through our interaction with others, its consequence,
> untill we happen to obtain the social view.
>
> If you can live without ethics, try it ! Then let us know something real...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 19, 2012 1:22:13 AM UTC+5:30, gabbydott wrote:
>
> > Yes, the question is, can there be an overall ethics for all times, if
> > it had never existed before? Creating a bubble and living in this
> > bubble means you need to start reading Aesop's fables to your worms
> > for them to learn to act as you expect them to. What is your
> > experience?
>
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:19 PM, andrew vecsey <andrew...@gmail.com<javascript:>>
> > wrote:
> > > Reading the post below sent a shudder down my spine. Hitler argued for
> > > euthanasia and got support from people who saw nothing wrong with that.
> > You
> > > can very easily argue that you are doing the handicapped persons or
> > unwanted
> > > fetuses who can be seen to be a drain to others more fortunate a favor
> > by
> > > taking away their life. You can argue that they are either suffering
> > > needlessly and not living a fulfilled life or will not be loved.  That
> > is
> > > really opening up a can of worms. In my way of looking at things, the
> > people
> > > who are a drain or those who are unloved are a challenge to those more
> > > fortunate ones to carry them and care for them. Without them we can
> > easily
> > > forget our humanity and become cold hearted people who put a price tag
> > on
> > > life. Life is something that is given to everyone alive and no one
> > should
> > > think that they have a right to take it away from anyone.
>
> > > On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:07:29 PM UTC+2, RP Singh wrote:
>
> > >> Abortion is widely practiced and euthanasia is finding support from
> > >> some groups , ethics are changing with time. I see nothing wrong in
> > >> that.
>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:23 PM, rigsy03 <rig...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> > Your definition could argue for abortion and euthanasia- is that what
> > >> > you intend?
>
> > >> > On Sep 23, 9:20 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Conscious beings are a proof of God because otherwise an unconscious
> > >> >> Being
> > >> >> could not be said to exist. Existence is the seed which finds its
> > >> >> growth in
> > >> >> life.
>
> > >> > --
>
> > > --

--