Re: Mind's Eye Aliens, Slavery and Resources

Molly said she remembers that herself. No, that's not the shadow that
I perceive.

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:26 PM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I seem to remember the same issues raised on Molly Brogan
> Enterprises. We have been as welcoming as cold custard on Belgian
> French fries.
>
> On 7 Nov, 11:42, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The flicking of the switch could make you see yourself as the promoter
>> of your own interests/truths/wannabes/wannagets and fears. Commonly
>> known examples are The Wave and the Blue-Eyed-Brown-Eyed experiments.
>> When is a Nothing an Individual and the individual a Part Of The
>> Group? After its baptizing, its confirmation, its right to confirm
>> others? Works both ways, of course. The problem lies in the denial of
>> the role we play in each game, not in the forgetting of us being
>> merely players - the Gutenberg project or others can help out our
>> memory, as you correctly remind us.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Molly is right Neil once a person is part of the group it is
>> > difficult to get rid of them,, for which I am grateful.. Like hearing
>> > what other people say and I am not adverse to new ideas.. but I am
>> > against people who want to use the group for their self promotion.
>> > Down loaded a book from project Gutenberg called the Gospels of
>> > Buddha.. It is absolutely fascinating right now I am working on
>> > a=one of the sermons dealing with the evolution of sin fascinating,,
>> > mainly because we have the same problems today. not a promotion of
>> > some wanna be guru. it is free for any one who wants to down load
>> > it..
>> > got to get back to reading
>> > Allan
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Not in a group.
>>
>> >> On Nov 6, 6:41 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> It's just a flick of a switch Molly.
>>
>> >>> On 4 Nov, 19:44, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > I have to agree with Alan on this one, having been moderator long
>> >>> > enough to know it takes more time and is more of a pain to get rid of
>> >>> > a troll than let one in. They are not hard to spot. Quite boring.
>> >>> > Don't want to have to wonder if the included links lead to info
>> >>> > valuable to the conversation, or blatant sales crap with a donate
>> >>> > here and virus for free. Why go back to the place where we have to
>> >>> > be reminded why the guidelines were established in the first place?
>>
>> >>> > On Nov 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > > I always thought the idea is to have a polite community in which to
>> >>> > > exchange ideas.
>> >>> > > Although vulgarity really is quick way to see through the layers of
>> >>> > > personality people hide beneath.
>> >>> > > Allan
>>
>> >>> > > Matrix ** th3 beginning light
>> >>> > > On Nov 4, 2012 7:32 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > > > Got to agree the last bit Molly and most of the rest. I don't like
>> >>> > > > the concept of speech crime or asking for bans over trivia., or the
>> >>> > > > class-base in much etiquette. I have called Chaz much worse - largely
>> >>> > > > because I like the bloke. I'm quite happy for people like Andrew to
>> >>> > > > tell us they have made a video and it's easy enough to switch off
>> >>> > > > those who want to sell us snake oil. I'm a survivor of barrckroom
>> >>> > > > days when a greeting without insults in it was an insult. Oscar Wilde
>> >>> > > > had a fine line in insult-prose. I'm game to risk a bit more of
>> >>> > > > Tantra's. Allan may have tossed his rattle out of the cot on this one
>> >>> > > > - or be right. Too early to tell.
>>
>> >>> > > > On 4 Nov, 13:42, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > We soon forget what a charge Chaz got from obscenely insulting people,
>> >>> > > > > especially those new to the conversation. You yourself called him a
>> >>> > > > shit,
>> >>> > > > > Neil, more than once. But maybe that was enjoyable to you. In the end,
>> >>> > > > I
>> >>> > > > > think Chris made the right decision as it became impossible to exchange
>> >>> > > > > ideas between tirades. I do agree on your opinion on politesse, and find
>> >>> > > > > it more of a juvenile debutante exchange, often nastier than anything
>> >>> > > > > coming from Chaz. Much to be said for intelligent argumentation over
>> >>> > > > > flinging insults and emotional rhetoric. Enough soap operas in the world
>> >>> > > > > as it is.
>>
>> >>> > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2012 7:24:43 AM UTC-5, archytas wrote:
>>
>> >>> > > > > > Well, mon vieux lapin, how long is it since you got called 'son'! We
>> >>> > > > > > have, of course, entered the eristic here (one of nine generally
>> >>> > > > > > allowable forms of argument). Tantra clearly has a good line in
>> >>> > > > > > rather toffee-nosed insult prose. Sticks and stones. I didn't keep
>> >>> > > > > > my police uniform. The economy is libidinal. Most people settle to
>> >>> > > > > > the rules. If we get too white, bourgeois and polite I'll leave. I
>> >>> > > > > > should have when we excluded Chazwin. It might be interesting to see
>> >>> > > > > > Tant's invective turned to something interesting.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > On 4 Nov, 08:14, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > Wow i am impressed,, so that is what tantra psychology is all
>> >>> > > > about...
>> >>> > > > > > > you need to read the guide lines..
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > what you don't understand is that you are apparently the front person
>> >>> > > > > > > for this organization or what ever it is..
>> >>> > > > > > > Personally I do not care what you believe and you are perfectly
>> >>> > > > > > > welcome to use thoughts , ideas and concepts but not internet links
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > There is an old saying that when you point a finger at a person you
>> >>> > > > > > > need to remember that three finger fingers pointing back at you with
>> >>> > > > a
>> >>> > > > > > > thumb holding them firmly in place.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > From your response I doubt that you are old enough tobe my father,,
>> >>> > > > > > > sorry I know where he is,,
>> >>> > > > > > > Allan
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Tantra Psychology
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > > Allan, son, your remarks and blovatenous disposition are
>> >>> > > > demonstrative
>> >>> > > > > > > > of a rabidly rapacious beast humping others' dignity in a fervently
>> >>> > > > > > > > dildonic cannibalistic display of masturbatory vanity surfing
>> >>> > > > > > > > projecting your splatter from within the toxic waste of your own
>> >>> > > > > > > > perversity and drunken hatreds.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > > Are you the resident poster-child demonstrating the consequences of
>> >>> > > > > > > > bimbonic anal sex run amok and the unbridled malignant beastiality
>> >>> > > > > > > > spilling forth from the bowels of pre-meditated ignorance?
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > > On 11/3/12, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > >> Neil when the contribute rather than just links to their
>> >>> > > > propaganda
>> >>> > > > > > > >> they should be monitored so far all Ihave seen is solicitation to
>> >>> > > > > > > >> join their group with empty promises..
>> >>> > > > > > > >> Allan
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:13 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com>
>> >>> > > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > >>> live and let live for now Al - I'm hardly a believer.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>> On 3 Nov, 20:58, Tantra Psychology <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> Allan,
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> One's state of mind is what one is seeing. I am sannyasin, I
>> >>> > > > teach
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> tantra psychology to receptive hearts/minds at no charge,
>> >>> > > > including
>> >>> > > > > > to
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> young people from compromised families who cannot afford even
>> >>> > > > > > enough
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> room for their children to live in a proper evvironment, which
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> necessitates renting space from offices so the children can
>> >>> > > > > > optimize
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> their wellbeing for free.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> For something that's FREE, given selflessly at the forfeiture of
>> >>> > > > > > one's
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> own career for the wellbeing of humanity at large, what you've
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> perceived is quantumly distant from such sacrifices, Allan.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>>http://bit.ly/MysticalPresentations3http://twitter/TantraPsych
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> They are "educated" who have learned much, remembered much,
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> and make use of their knowledge in everyday life.
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> And of these lessons integrated into their life,
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> moral conscience is the most imperative to learn
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> and convey to others.
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> Their virtues give true meaning to education.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> On 11/3/12, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > Sorry Tantra I looked at your links,, except twitter and I
>> >>> > > > > > don't do
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > twitter what I see is nothing more than a sales pitch with
>> >>> > > > big
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > promises and a big sign saying donate through WEPAY.
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > Allan
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Tantra Psychology
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> > <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> Hello Bill,
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> I agree with each and both, prepare for the crude as well as
>> >>> > > > the
>> >>> > > > > > more
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> sublime. Plus, when technological thresholds are similar,
>> >>> > > > > > perhaps in
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> different arenas, there may still be some incongruencies
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> discombobulating establishing rapport. Such should be
>> >>> > > > prepared
>> >>> > > > > > for
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> also.
>>
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> Whatever the configuration of congruencies and incongruencies
>> >>> > > > > > between
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> us and our extended families from off the planet, ethics
>> >>> > > > 'must'
>> >>> > > > > > be
>> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> conjugated, exchanges of thoughts, resources and
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more »
>
> --
>
>
>

--