Re: Mind's Eye Aliens, Slavery and Resources

I have to agree with Alan on this one, having been moderator long
enough to know it takes more time and is more of a pain to get rid of
a troll than let one in. They are not hard to spot. Quite boring.
Don't want to have to wonder if the included links lead to info
valuable to the conversation, or blatant sales crap with a donate
here and virus for free. Why go back to the place where we have to
be reminded why the guidelines were established in the first place?

On Nov 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I always thought the idea is to have a polite community in which to
> exchange ideas.
> Although vulgarity really is quick way to see through the layers of
> personality people hide beneath.
> Allan
>
> Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> On Nov 4, 2012 7:32 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Got to agree the last bit Molly and most of the rest.  I don't like
> > the concept of speech crime or asking for bans over trivia., or the
> > class-base in much etiquette.  I have called Chaz much worse - largely
> > because I like the bloke.  I'm quite happy for people like Andrew to
> > tell us they have made a video and it's easy enough to switch off
> > those who want to sell us snake oil.  I'm a survivor of barrckroom
> > days when a greeting without insults in it was an insult.  Oscar Wilde
> > had a fine line in insult-prose.  I'm game to risk a bit more of
> > Tantra's. Allan may have tossed his rattle out of the cot on this one
> > - or be right.  Too early to tell.
>
> > On 4 Nov, 13:42, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > We soon forget what a charge Chaz got from obscenely insulting people,
> > > especially those new to the conversation.  You yourself called him a
> > shit,
> > > Neil, more than once.  But maybe that was enjoyable to you.  In the end,
> > I
> > > think Chris made the right decision as it became impossible to exchange
> > > ideas between tirades.  I do agree on your opinion on politesse, and find
> > > it more of a juvenile debutante exchange, often nastier than anything
> > > coming from Chaz. Much to be said for intelligent argumentation over
> > > flinging insults and emotional rhetoric.  Enough soap operas in the world
> > > as it is.
>
> > > On Sunday, November 4, 2012 7:24:43 AM UTC-5, archytas wrote:
>
> > > > Well, mon vieux lapin, how long is it since you got called 'son'!  We
> > > > have, of course, entered the eristic here (one of nine generally
> > > > allowable forms of argument).  Tantra clearly has a good line in
> > > > rather toffee-nosed insult prose.  Sticks and stones.  I didn't keep
> > > > my police uniform.  The economy is libidinal.  Most people settle to
> > > > the rules.  If we get too white, bourgeois and polite I'll leave.  I
> > > > should have when we excluded Chazwin.  It might be interesting to see
> > > > Tant's invective turned to something interesting.
>
> > > > On 4 Nov, 08:14, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Wow i am impressed,, so that is what tantra psychology is all
> > about...
> > > > >  you need to read the guide lines..
>
> > > > > what you don't understand is that you are apparently the front person
> > > > > for this organization  or what ever it is..
> > > > > Personally I do not care what you believe and you are perfectly
> > > > > welcome to use thoughts , ideas and concepts  but not internet links
>
> > > > > There is an old  saying that when you point a finger at a person you
> > > > > need to remember that three finger fingers pointing back at you with
> > a
> > > > > thumb holding them firmly in place.
>
> > > > > From your response I doubt that you are old enough tobe my father,,
> > > > > sorry I know where he is,,
> > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Tantra Psychology
>
> > > > > <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Allan, son, your remarks and blovatenous disposition are
> > demonstrative
> > > > > > of a rabidly rapacious beast humping others' dignity in a fervently
> > > > > > dildonic cannibalistic display of masturbatory vanity surfing
> > > > > > projecting your splatter from within the toxic waste of your own
> > > > > > perversity and drunken hatreds.
>
> > > > > > Are you the resident poster-child demonstrating the consequences of
> > > > > > bimbonic anal sex run amok and the unbridled malignant beastiality
> > > > > > spilling forth from the bowels of pre-meditated ignorance?
>
> > > > > > On 11/3/12, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> Neil when the contribute rather than just links to their
> > propaganda
> > > > > >> they should be monitored  so far all Ihave seen is solicitation to
> > > > > >> join their group with empty promises..
> > > > > >> Allan
>
> > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:13 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >>> live and let live for now Al - I'm hardly a believer.
>
> > > > > >>> On 3 Nov, 20:58, Tantra Psychology <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com
>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> Allan,
>
> > > > > >>>> One's state of mind is what one is seeing.  I am sannyasin, I
> > teach
> > > > > >>>> tantra psychology to receptive hearts/minds at no charge,
> > including
> > > > to
> > > > > >>>> young people from compromised families who cannot afford even
> > > > enough
> > > > > >>>> room for their children to live in a proper evvironment, which
> > > > > >>>> necessitates renting space from offices so the children can
> > > > optimize
> > > > > >>>> their wellbeing for free.
>
> > > > > >>>> For something that's FREE, given selflessly at the forfeiture of
> > > > one's
> > > > > >>>> own career for the wellbeing of humanity at large, what you've
> > > > > >>>> perceived is quantumly distant from such sacrifices, Allan.
>
> > > > > >>>>http://bit.ly/MysticalPresentations3http://twitter/TantraPsych
>
> > > > > >>>> They are "educated" who have learned much, remembered much,
> > > > > >>>> and make use of their knowledge in everyday life.
> > > > > >>>> And of these lessons integrated into their life,
> > > > > >>>> moral conscience is the most imperative to learn
> > > > > >>>> and convey to others.
> > > > > >>>> Their virtues give true meaning to education.
>
> > > > > >>>> On 11/3/12, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>> > Sorry Tantra  I looked at your links,, except twitter  and I
> > > > don't do
> > > > > >>>> > twitter    what I see is nothing more than a sales pitch with
> > big
> > > > > >>>> > promises  and a big sign saying donate through WEPAY.
> > > > > >>>> > Allan
>
> > > > > >>>> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Tantra Psychology
> > > > > >>>> > <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> >> Hello Bill,
>
> > > > > >>>> >> I agree with each and both, prepare for the crude as well as
> > the
> > > > more
> > > > > >>>> >> sublime.  Plus, when technological thresholds are similar,
> > > > perhaps in
> > > > > >>>> >> different arenas, there may still be some incongruencies
> > > > > >>>> >> discombobulating establishing rapport.  Such should be
> > prepared
> > > > for
> > > > > >>>> >> also.
>
> > > > > >>>> >> Whatever the configuration of congruencies and incongruencies
> > > > between
> > > > > >>>> >> us and our extended families from off the planet, ethics
> > 'must'
> > > > be
> > > > > >>>> >> conjugated, exchanges of thoughts, resources and principles
> > must
> > > > be
> > > > > >>>> >> engated ethically and we must be prepared for the
> >  unexpected,
> > > > with
> > > > > >>>> >> ever greater minds and hearts assuring optimal relationship
> > > > > >>>> >> development for the wellbeing of all.
>
> > > > > >>>> >> Satya
> > > > > >>>> >> --
> > > > > >>>> >>http://TantraPsychology.Shows.it/
>
> > > > > >>>> >>http://bit.ly/MysticalPresentations3
>
> > > > > >>>> >>http://twitter/TantraPsych
>
> > > > > >>>> >> They are "educated" who have learned much, remembered much,
> > > > > >>>> >> and make use of their knowledge in everyday life.
> > > > > >>>> >> And of these lessons integrated into their life,
> > > > > >>>> >> moral conscience is the most imperative to learn
> > > > > >>>> >> and convey to others.
> > > > > >>>> >> Their virtues give true meaning to education.
>
> > > > > >>>> >> On 10/24/12, William L Houts <luka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>> >>> All right, I just wanted to run this by you guys.  I know it
> > > > seems
> > > > > >>>> >>> I'm
> > > > > >>>> >>> always rattlling on about aliens, but they're really a
> > stand in
> > > > for,
> > > > > >>>> >>> well, for a lot of things.  Anyway, I've been on Facebook
> > and
> > > > > >>>> >>> recently
> > > > > >>>> >>> made a status report commenting on the conversation we had
> > > > going on
> > > > > >>>> >>> here
> > > > > >>>> >>> about hypothetical aliens and what they might or might not
> > want
> > > > from
> > > > > >>>> >>> us.  And I was making the point that I made here: that said
> > > > aliens
> > > > > >>>> >>> will
> > > > > >>>> >>> turn out to be just as befuddled by it all as we are, and
> > are
> > > > > >>>> >>> probably
> > > > > >>>> >>> in no position to give us the goods on life's mysteries, or
> > > > even make
> > > > > >>>> >>> a
> > > > > >>>> >>> good cocktail.
>
> > > > > >>>> >>> Now, my friend Matt, who is very smart but also very bitchy,
> > > > put
> > > > > >>>> >>> forth
> > > > > >>>> >>> Professor Hawking's notion:  that we'd better keep our heads
> > > > down
> > > > > >>>> >>> low,
> > > > > >>>> >>> because history tells us that when a more technologically
> > > > advanced
> > > > > >>>> >>> species meets a less developed one, the results are usually
> > > > horrible
> > > > > >>>> >>> for
> > > > > >>>> >>> the latter.  I replied that yes, this does seem to be the
> > > > pattern in
> > > > > >>>> >>> Earth history.  But, I went on, races which manage to break
> > the
> > > > > >>>> >>> lightspeed barrier are going to have better things to do
> > than
> > > > enslave
> > > > > >>>> >>> 7
> > > > > >>>> >>> billion people, or even mistreat them very much. Their
> > energy
> > > > > >>>> >>> problems,
> > > > > >>>> >>> I said more or less, will have been solved to such an extent
> > > > that
> > > > > >>>> >>> they
> > > > > >>>> >>> won't have to vampirize us.  Matt made it clear that he
> > thought
> > > > I
> > > > > >>>> >>> was
> > > > > >>>> >>> being terrifically naive.
>
> > > > > >>>> >>> Now, Mat is quickly becoming a sour old queen, but I want to
> > > > know:
> > > > > >>>> >>> with
> > > > > >>>> >>> whom would you agree?  Or is there a third answer which I
> > > > haven't
> > > > > >>>> >>> proposed here?
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--