Re: Mind's Eye Aliens, Slavery and Resources

I am always amazed by people who establish standards that don't matter
and ignore what does. You aren't that petty mate.

On 9 Nov, 19:44, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Occasionally vulgar language has its place. There is a point that it
> goes excessive.   as for locker room vulgarity  not in locker rooms I
> was in..but that was probably me..   I believe we are here for
> discussions and not promotions..  I don't mind it when our members
> keep us informed of what they are doing   Pat is a good example, with
> his book ,,  even bought a copy for myself..  also bought one of
> Molly's ,,
>
> We know both people and for along time  and they are not promoting
> anything..   I do object to a person using the  group to promote their
> groups with little interest in the group and immediately resort to
> pure vulgarity that service served no purpose other than show the true
> person ..  I am not apposed to to new ideas. I am not a great video
> watcher as I like to pick apart ideas and  I can examine them closely
> Promotional web pages are not a discussion,
>
> I am not a great fan of group promoting there ideas,, I have had to
> deal with to many of them to closely and I have seen first hand the
> damage they have done. I just don't like having to deal with and live
> with the fallout of of their enlightenment.
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think Andrew has it about right - though the question is on line
> > drawing.  I am more sickened by mainstream news media than eristic
> > exchange or so-called foul language.  It's easy enough to flick the
> > moderation switch.  I have hauled that stone of shame myself.
>
> > On 7 Nov, 12:43, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Molly said she remembers that herself. No, that's not the shadow that
> >> I perceive.
>
> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:26 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I seem to remember the same issues raised on Molly Brogan
> >> > Enterprises.  We have been as welcoming as cold custard on Belgian
> >> > French fries.
>
> >> > On 7 Nov, 11:42, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> The flicking of the switch could make you see yourself as the promoter
> >> >> of your own interests/truths/wannabes/wannagets and fears. Commonly
> >> >> known examples are The Wave and the Blue-Eyed-Brown-Eyed experiments.
> >> >> When is a Nothing an Individual and the individual a Part Of The
> >> >> Group? After its baptizing, its confirmation, its right to confirm
> >> >> others? Works both ways, of course. The problem lies in the denial of
> >> >> the role we play in each game, not in the forgetting of us being
> >> >> merely players - the Gutenberg project or others can help out our
> >> >> memory, as you correctly remind us.
>
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Molly is right Neil  once a person is part of the group it is
> >> >> > difficult to get rid of them,,  for which I am grateful.. Like hearing
> >> >> > what other people say  and I am not adverse to new ideas..  but I am
> >> >> > against people who want to use the group for their self promotion.
> >> >> > Down loaded a book from project Gutenberg called the Gospels of
> >> >> > Buddha..   It is absolutely fascinating right now I am working on
> >> >> > a=one of the sermons dealing with the evolution of sin  fascinating,,
> >> >> > mainly because we have the same problems today.   not a promotion of
> >> >> > some wanna be guru.   it is free for any one who wants to down load
> >> >> > it..
> >> >> > got to get back to reading
> >> >> > Allan
>
> >> >> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> Not in a group.
>
> >> >> >> On Nov 6, 6:41 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> It's just a flick of a switch Molly.
>
> >> >> >>> On 4 Nov, 19:44, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> > I have to agree with Alan on this one, having been moderator long
> >> >> >>> > enough to know it takes more time and is more of a pain to get rid of
> >> >> >>> > a troll than let one in.  They are not hard to spot.  Quite boring.
> >> >> >>> > Don't want to have to wonder if the included links lead to info
> >> >> >>> > valuable to the conversation, or blatant sales crap with a donate
> >> >> >>> >  here and virus for free.  Why go back to the place where we have to
> >> >> >>> > be reminded why the guidelines were established in the first place?
>
> >> >> >>> > On Nov 4, 1:47 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> > > I always thought the idea is to have a polite community in which to
> >> >> >>> > > exchange ideas.
> >> >> >>> > > Although vulgarity really is quick way to see through the layers of
> >> >> >>> > > personality people hide beneath.
> >> >> >>> > > Allan
>
> >> >> >>> > > Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
> >> >> >>> > > On Nov 4, 2012 7:32 PM, "archytas" <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> > > > Got to agree the last bit Molly and most of the rest.  I don't like
> >> >> >>> > > > the concept of speech crime or asking for bans over trivia., or the
> >> >> >>> > > > class-base in much etiquette.  I have called Chaz much worse - largely
> >> >> >>> > > > because I like the bloke.  I'm quite happy for people like Andrew to
> >> >> >>> > > > tell us they have made a video and it's easy enough to switch off
> >> >> >>> > > > those who want to sell us snake oil.  I'm a survivor of barrckroom
> >> >> >>> > > > days when a greeting without insults in it was an insult.  Oscar Wilde
> >> >> >>> > > > had a fine line in insult-prose.  I'm game to risk a bit more of
> >> >> >>> > > > Tantra's. Allan may have tossed his rattle out of the cot on this one
> >> >> >>> > > > - or be right.  Too early to tell.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > On 4 Nov, 13:42, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > We soon forget what a charge Chaz got from obscenely insulting people,
> >> >> >>> > > > > especially those new to the conversation.  You yourself called him a
> >> >> >>> > > > shit,
> >> >> >>> > > > > Neil, more than once.  But maybe that was enjoyable to you.  In the end,
> >> >> >>> > > > I
> >> >> >>> > > > > think Chris made the right decision as it became impossible to exchange
> >> >> >>> > > > > ideas between tirades.  I do agree on your opinion on politesse, and find
> >> >> >>> > > > > it more of a juvenile debutante exchange, often nastier than anything
> >> >> >>> > > > > coming from Chaz. Much to be said for intelligent argumentation over
> >> >> >>> > > > > flinging insults and emotional rhetoric.  Enough soap operas in the world
> >> >> >>> > > > > as it is.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > On Sunday, November 4, 2012 7:24:43 AM UTC-5, archytas wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > Well, mon vieux lapin, how long is it since you got called 'son'!  We
> >> >> >>> > > > > > have, of course, entered the eristic here (one of nine generally
> >> >> >>> > > > > > allowable forms of argument).  Tantra clearly has a good line in
> >> >> >>> > > > > > rather toffee-nosed insult prose.  Sticks and stones.  I didn't keep
> >> >> >>> > > > > > my police uniform.  The economy is libidinal.  Most people settle to
> >> >> >>> > > > > > the rules.  If we get too white, bourgeois and polite I'll leave.  I
> >> >> >>> > > > > > should have when we excluded Chazwin.  It might be interesting to see
> >> >> >>> > > > > > Tant's invective turned to something interesting.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > On 4 Nov, 08:14, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > Wow i am impressed,, so that is what tantra psychology is all
> >> >> >>> > > > about...
> >> >> >>> > > > > > >  you need to read the guide lines..
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > what you don't understand is that you are apparently the front person
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > for this organization  or what ever it is..
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > Personally I do not care what you believe and you are perfectly
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > welcome to use thoughts , ideas and concepts  but not internet links
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > There is an old  saying that when you point a finger at a person you
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > need to remember that three finger fingers pointing back at you with
> >> >> >>> > > > a
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > thumb holding them firmly in place.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > From your response I doubt that you are old enough tobe my father,,
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > sorry I know where he is,,
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > Allan
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Tantra Psychology
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > Allan, son, your remarks and blovatenous disposition are
> >> >> >>> > > > demonstrative
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > of a rabidly rapacious beast humping others' dignity in a fervently
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > dildonic cannibalistic display of masturbatory vanity surfing
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > projecting your splatter from within the toxic waste of your own
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > perversity and drunken hatreds.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > Are you the resident poster-child demonstrating the consequences of
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > bimbonic anal sex run amok and the unbridled malignant beastiality
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > spilling forth from the bowels of pre-meditated ignorance?
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > On 11/3/12, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> Neil when the contribute rather than just links to their
> >> >> >>> > > > propaganda
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> they should be monitored  so far all Ihave seen is solicitation to
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> join their group with empty promises..
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> Allan
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:13 PM, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> > > > wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> live and let live for now Al - I'm hardly a believer.
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> On 3 Nov, 20:58, Tantra Psychology <tantrapsycholog...@gmail.com
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> Allan,
>
> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> One's state of mind is what one is seeing.  I am sannyasin, I
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--