Re: Mind's Eye Instinct for survival

Nope Gabs, it is merely my own theistic belife about reality.  You of course are free to belive differanty.
On Thursday, 29 November 2012 13:15:23 UTC, gabbydott wrote:

Does this mean self-assertion and truth construction are co-dependant? 

2012/11/29 Lee Douglas <leerev...@gmail.com>

Heh heh it alswys does Molly, as we say 'Ik onkar, sat naam'

On Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:12:26 UTC, Molly wrote:

back to the "what is truth" discourse, I see

On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:33:14 AM UTC-5, Lee Douglas wrote:

Yay RP my freind on that we can agree.

On Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:41:42 UTC, RP Singh wrote:

Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the brain live
--1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the universe ,but
ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time of the
universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and nothing else.

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas <nwt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc.  We are already
> 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation.  One's mind could be
> transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our bodies are
> currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new substrate could
> have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's 'hope'.  Such
> substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and be able to re-
> transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to make.  This would
> be a time beyond singularity.  We don't know what such intelligence
> might invent or even discover - perhaps such intelligence would
> discover we are not as alone as we think.  Being human or human being
> might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to live free again.
> We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much part of our
> behaviour now.
>
> On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> T9   grrrrrrr
>> Allan
>>
>> Matrix  **  th3 beginning light
>> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott" <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe' then (my grammar and
>> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then' though)! :)
>>
>> > 2012/11/28 James <ashkas...@gmail.com>
>>
>> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be, coextensively. Maybe.
>>
>> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for immortality and the
>> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth. It is an off-shoot of
>> >>> the instinct for survival.
>>
>> >>> --
>>
>> >> --
>>
>> >  --
>
> --
>
>
>

--
 
 
 

--