Molly, that letter was a little nutty, some might say fringe. Zurker was broadcast to the general public so the tone doesn't seem appropriate but I can see where he was coming from just that there must be a better strategy. I was intrigued by some of their recent news and discussions but sadly my time is in extremely short supply and apparently of little value. Too bad they lost their lead developer, I found some aspects of the few pages I read to be respectable from a performance standpoint: browsing a social network with mixed multimedia and discussions that consumes little memory is rare these days (frowns for both the big G, and Faceboot/Fakebook). I noticed a series of very unoriginal echoes around the web about it being a ponzi scheme but little in the way of how that differentiates Zurker from any other growth oriented community, nor how that in what appear to be some small aspects this should be incompatible with their philosophy or vision.
Allan, just think of all those facebook icons we see scattered across the web, the little scripted syndication modules that appear on the side of so many blogs and company sites as your information: what we read, when we read it, buying preferences, political stances, what types of porn (most images are designed to illicit a response, those accumulated responses are stored in logs across a multitude of network components and server technologies potentially forever) whether it be a news item, list of articles, funny pictures or anything else, every single click accumulates into a growing body of information that reinforces the cross referential integrity to profile who you are, how you think, what you are thinking now, and eventually even why. It makes one wonder who should we trust with this information. The business response seems to be to make the largest providers of safety and control the ultimate holders of global network security- and of course history hasn't rewarded huge sums to contracts on that scale.. Where these lines blur between coercion, soft fascism, narcissism, power and greed leads us to the dame door steps it always has. Ponzi schemes are childsplay when you can run the company store. Nuff said, they are playing with fire.
On 3/3/2014 2:18 PM, Allan H wrote:
Well Andrew there was a saying in the US in the '60 \ 70's that went " Cash, grass or associated nobody rides for free. "
Google is not for free tour are sold as their commodity. Don't kid yourself nothing is for free including the internet. The only semi solution is to conduct the group chatter via snail mail. I am laughing visualizing a mail slot full of minds-eye responses. 75€ cent per letter it would be an expensive hobby, :-P
( Matrix ~ Do No Harm
) ~ Soul controls body
[_D ~ Allan H
-----Original Message-----
From: andrew vecsey <andrewvecsey@gmail.com>
To: minds-eye@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: secure network
--
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 5:33:36 AM UTC+1, Ash wrote:...... Andrew sounds in the know regarding
PGP ........
I wish I could help out but unfortunatelly the only thing I know about PGP is what the letters stand for. What I would like to hear are some arguments as to what benefits a change would give. I think these news groups have been running for such a long time that hopefully they will keep running and remain free. I do not see changing something just for the sake of change. Why try to fix something if it is not broken.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário