Re: Mind's Eye Re: Blog

I've just been around a few blogs to look at how argument works in them.  I guess this falls foul of your criteria Gabbs.  In one of them I was wondering to what extent some blogging is just part of some kind of money-go-round.  This one posts a few links to newspapers, book-plugs, cross-posts and a small original content (Naked Capitalism).  One or two of the commentators were really good, but one suspects the blog is phony.  Privacy issues are always double-edged, and, of course, mirror sites were once very common.  Usenet was always 'public'.  Not sure where you're coming from, other than you rarely fail to tease Molly.

On Thursday, 29 May 2014 08:32:08 UTC+1, Gabby wrote:

Yeah, greed and jealousy can be strong motivators to want to change existing power relations and to gain that control one self. 

No, this blog isue here reminds me of Molly having done a similar thing - with the permission of those, whose content she used though. I found it unacceptable and very American to not be able to see the role conflict with being a ME moderator and the responsibiliy for the group climate in which the content she used was created. I have gotten used to have an eye on why people select what to then construct a new truth and how that attracts those who have the desire to become one of the chosen few. 

All throughout history people have learned to develop group specific codes to be able to communicate without being immediately understood by the ruling class. I am a German in an internet world ruled by Americans. It would be rediculous would I want to insist on my right for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informational_self-determination in this group here. I had to find another way to keep my fingers still and still say something.

Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2014 schrieb allan :

What amazes me  is the apparent ease with which it was done. Looks like someone stole a government spy program..  figures



-----Original Message-----
From: archytas <nwterry@gmail.com>
To: minds-eye@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, 29 May 2014 12:56 AM
Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Blog

Very odd taht anyone would have been bothered.

On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 18:12:33 UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:

I read a summary of the copyright law . We are the copyholders of our work.
We are sharing ideas among friends. The blogger does not have the right to publish our (my) work open to the general public.
I think the blogger needs to permanetly cease his activity. I can not speak for the community he does not have my permission to copy and publish my work.
I believe blogger is owned by Google and they are aiding and abeding in a criminal activity.

Allan.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.