It looked like some effort had gone in so I did approve it to surface any issues.
On Thursday, 9 October 2014 15:03:22 UTC+1, Molly wrote:
-- On Thursday, 9 October 2014 15:03:22 UTC+1, Molly wrote:
Looks like this member joined this group under two different email addresses, one in 2009 and one in 2011. Both accounts look like they are categorized as "moderated" which should mean we have to approve them. This post, from the uta 2009 address, looks like a failed response to a post in your perception thread over the email, which may change the name of the topic to the subject of the email that came to her. If she replies to the email, it changes the name of the topic, creating a new one.If you approved this in the moderation queue to ask your question here, there is no problem with unapproved posts getting through. The only problem that remains is that people don't understand the technology. Not sure we can do anything about that.
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 4:13:37 AM UTC-4, archytas wrote:Does anyone know what posts like this are about?
On Thursday, 9 October 2014 09:09:52 UTC+1, uta wrote:Sent from my BlackBerry®
powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSATSender: minds-eye@googlegroups.comDate: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:15:18 +0000To: Digest recipients<minds-eye@googlegroups.com >ReplyTo: minds-eye@googlegroups.comSubject: Mind's Eye Digest for minds-eye@googlegroups.com - 2 updates in 1 topic
- Perception as action - 2 Updates
archytas <nwterry@gmail.com>: Oct 03 07:34AM -0700
Enactive theories of imagery may be seen as modern successors to the *motor
theories* of the early twentieth century. They depend the idea that
*perception* is not mere passive receptivity (or even receptivity plus
inner processing), but a form of action, something *done* by the organism.
The literature is legion. The perceiving organism is not merely
registering but exploring and *asking questions* of its environment,
actively and intentionally (though not necessarily with conscious volition)
seeking out the answers in the sensory stimuli that surround it. Imagery is
then experienced when someone persists in acting out the seeking of some
particular information even though they cannot reasonably expect it to be
there. We have imagery of, say, a cat, when we go through (some of) the
motions of looking at something and determining that it is a cat, even
though there is no cat (and perhaps nothing relevant at all) there to be
seen. Visually imagining a cat is seeing nothing-in-particular *as* a cat.
I'd have a bet that Facil could sketch my cat, a fluffy black and white
ball of haughty 'evil' with claws and purring schemer leading me and two
dogs a merry dance of Salome to get a midnight feast share.
archytas <nwterry@gmail.com>: Oct 03 05:33PM -0700
This photograph looks rather mundane. It has been widely posted under the
title 'Why America is not prepared for an ebola outbreak'. The rolled up
sleeves on the hasmat suit being the cue.
On Friday, 3 October 2014 15:34:28 UTC+1, archytas wrote:
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário