Mind's Eye Re: Signing

Superfluous as in very runny perhaps?  When the internet first came about, academics thought we might have non-authority-led discourse.  Well - ho ho ho to that one.  I can't see Gabbers being interested in a trolls charter, so I can only wonder what the honourable member might be on about, knowing any suggestion I might make only an interpretation.  In England, twittering a picture of English flags and a white van has just become just another way to be sacked.

On Friday, 21 November 2014 10:01:34 UTC, Gabby wrote:
Signing petitions is a wonderful thing. Signing contracts makes sense. But what wonderful sense does automated signing make in postings that show the name of the poster in the very beginning of each posting?

As we have seen over the years here, the name of the poster is only the pretext to and for the additional massage that is to be pushed into the readers eye and further. Unfortunately for poster, the means of continuous pain evocation only leads to thickening the scar tissue of the cornea and the need to send out more sweet light increases. And so the evolutionary spiral of no shadow without light is spinning higher and higher, further and further.

Now here is my suggestion for a peaceful dissolution:
Let's have the owner and moderators of the blue eye include all the bad things, all the violence that we perceive in the world in the guidelines. Let's suggest translations in all other languages! Let's make it very clear that we only welcome those who obey!

And signing could become superfluous.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário