My current hypothesis is that the information that my star sign is Gemini, is somehow reoccurring in the shape of the two heads, of which one needs to be cut off with an ax. Gemini are said to be two faced. What I find interesting about this is that the ax or sword are not my preferred killing weapons, I see them more as typical male murder weapons, no, I, like many women, prefer scissors with two sharp "faces" in the inside doing the job I need them for.
As for ridiculously unsharp faces, I read most of the stuff here via gmail and therefore see you and Allan present themselves with dog images! Not really what you'd expect two elderly gentlemen to look like and not to be mistaken for pedophiles trying to impress young kids with looking cute. I remember you once had a picture uploaded on gravity, the platform that needed social data for the development of their commercial social graph. That was long time ago, so when I see the picture of Strauss-Kahn in the media these days, I find more and more he looks like you.
2015-02-10 23:09 GMT+01:00 archytas <nwterry@gmail.com>:
In Starwarp one assumes we would quickly clone Data and a few holograms, let them get on with the work and retire to the holosuite tp enjoy ourselves in 'real adventures'.
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 9:38:19 PM UTC, archytas wrote:The only people I meet like that tend to be online students Tony. We use Skype video conferencing for a few sessions, so have actually seen each other. I'm quieter than people imagine, though none have yet said 'uglier'. I'm very prone to catch whatever bugs go around university environments too, so rather like electronic distance. With colleagues, the situation is we know a lot more about each other than most in online encounters.My version has 'confusion' written through it. I say something, Gabby takes it another way, or knows what I intended and chooses another slant for whatever reason. Online, I assume she has a sense of humour and a good turn with words. Deception is not part of this in the first place. Just guesses with less risk than so called reality. I suppose the classic online deceiver is the groomer - where the intent is to set up and image and then meet the victim.
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:54:18 PM UTC, facilitator wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:11:33 PM UTC-5, archytas wrote:The delusion that we are what we project is interesting Tony."We claim to be what we project". Your version allows for reality mine allows for dishonesty. I think most people want to project a filtered image of themselves enough so that if we ever meet people who we've only conversed with online we become slightly astonished how different they appear and act in "real life".--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/2_ICOWzarWY/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário