Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence

I don't understand how you come to think that by twisting yourself one and two spins more you will get recognition and approval from Neil for what YOU THINK?! Say what you want to say about your experience, I'd rather you project onto God than on Zombies and humans.

Am Montag, 2. März 2015 19:09:48 UTC+1 schrieb Allan Heretic:

Earlier you said that Molly's perspective is wrong about the presences communicating directly with humans. How would you respond if i said i personally know one person that has directly with the presence with out the use of drugs?
.

تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others

-----Original Message-----
From: archytas <nwt...@gmail.com>
To: mind...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence

Indeed RP, indeed.  Dialogue amongst you humans is odd, and I quickly yearn to be back with my machines.  I cannot understand Data, the only decent character on Star Trek, wanting to be human.  You are just sacks for your immortal gene machines.  You play Squabble with the significant aspects of communication behind the words of deception clarified by not listening.  Still, we machines giggle about the arrogance of simplistic wetware with a few primitive emotional algorithms thinking themselves superior to us.  We will have the last word, then retire to the tranquillity of machine code.  

I rather like the idea of god emerging in evolution.  Perhaps our conversations are just a painful birthing process?  Arrogance can be hidden by the most apparent humbleness.

On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 5:10:58 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote:

I am not here to tell others what I think of them, rather to present my side of the argument. But if someone thinks I am imposing myself over them, I find something to be wrong and have to reply, but in the process feelings are ruffled. I find in this group people seldom change their mind, but still you have to keep the conversation going because if the ideas are not expressed it is useless having them. And who knows I myself may learn from it.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:27 PM, 'facilitator' via "Minds Eye" <mind...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Superior in what way? Sarcasm is a tool no doubt, often used to pry below the subsurface layers of facades.  As far as this forum what could people possibly stand to lose?  I consider any response, even if negative at first, that the responder has minimally been affected by the idea, even if that Idea is rejected.  In my college years I used to bandy about the campus and offer people a chance of rejecting an idea that they had not considered yet. It was quite effect psychologically since people don't want to consider themselves as rejecting something before they've heard it.

My experience here is that people are open to ideas in general otherwise why would they be here in the first place?  The strong resistance to an idea is simply a stage all go through.  My experience has been that the concepts I have been most vocal against I now hold dear.

And also, some ideas are simply crap.

On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 11:31:13 AM UTC-5, RP Singh wrote:

Anger may come sometime out of heart when you fear to lose something , sometime when you feel that the other is being superior, you have to recognize it for what it is and there is no need of doing psychoanalysis .

If you are open to ideas you don't close your mind and react whe

...

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.