tracked?
On Aug 20, 9:17 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Strange I was reading what you wrote Paradox and the thought developed in
> an economic subculture ,, were friends grooups of people would work for the
> betterment of all a simple example might be if I could buy a product
> cheaper and then send it to those that wanted the product... setting aside
> the funds so when there was a product that some one else needed..
>
> With todays computers it would not be difficult to see who held or owed what
> debt.
>
> this not thought out just an rough idea.
> Allan
> On Aug 20, 2011 12:27 PM, "paradox" <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I hear you Allan; but this particular current fibrillation is more
> > systemic. The perceptual issues arise because we are applying steady-
> > state macroeconomic frames to system-wide transition states, and the
> > makets just dont get it. So, there's a communications issue right
> > there.
>
> > The specific challenges for "developed" economies is growth and debt.
> > The inverse pressure is particularly intense bcause of the size of
> > third party debt obligations (hence the dysfunctional hyper-
> > sensitivity to ratings outlooks); as with business cycles, one would
> > normally assume greater debt to fund growth to pay down debt; in this
> > particular environment, greater debt leads to debt quality uncertainty
> > which drives up cost of borrowing, which constrains the growth you
> > leveraged for in the first place.
>
> > The solution, to me, requires will, commitment, frame breaking, and a
> > good deal of creative thinking. FIrst we need to suspend the inflation
> > "rule" for a transition window. Then Central Banks need to hold more
> > short term sovereign liabilities to provide "breathing space". Then
> > Treasuries need to take a scalpel to taxes, particularly but not
> > limited to transaction based taxes such as VAT, to spur economic
> > activity aggressively. Then to create sovereign long term retail
> > income bonds to fund fiscal shortfalls.
>
> > Just to be sure, we're here taking about the difference between growth
> > rates of 1-2% (current) and 4-5% (target). We're not taking about an
> > economic calamity, though you would not know it with the markets and
> > media dancing to their own music. It's very useful to bear that in
> > mind always.
>
> > On Aug 19, 3:31 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> My guess is people let them.. they take the word of and ?authority? and
> call
> >> it good. there is no challangee to the those that are creating the
> problem
> >> in the first place.. aka bankers, stockmaarkets, corporations,, greedy
> >> individuals
> >> Allan
> >> On Aug 19, 2011 1:12 PM, "paradox" <eadohe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Recently, i read of an "authority" on institutional debt proclaim that
> >> > a global recession was now inevitable. My first thought was that this
> >> > was something of a curious "God like" statement, which was actually
> >> > plain and simply wrong. There is actually next to no risk of a global
> >> > recession.
>
> >> > How do they get away with stuff like this, i wonder?- Hide quoted text
> -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário