Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: From cradle to grave

:cringe: That was me being a wee bit sensitive, guess now you know one
of my soft spots. ;-) I agree though, personal responsibility goes
beyond the numbers. We need to be willing to make a change, courageous
enough to demand honest understanding from ourselves, and when the
sheer horror sinks in (see those numbers as those one cares about
most) we need enough wits collected to turn our anger and indignation
into social progress, personal wisdom and all that good stuff people
should be natural at.

Sorry I was blinded Gabby and missed the finer point, one's wits can
be quite evasive to collection hiding amongst the formative substrata.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nothing important. Sorry if my humor was inappropriate.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, James Lynch <ashkashal@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You're right, I didn't. Please be courteous Gabby, you have no idea
>> the things I know, have seen, or the impact on my life. For another
>> time perhaps.
>>
>> So, what else did you mean by this? :)
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:34 AM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Exactly, finding women's dealing with the world (as a landscape you can
>> > measure and therefore manage - aka statistics) stimulating, would be a
>> > good
>> > example of how I don't think social responsibility works. Not that you
>> > had
>> > ever said that! :)
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:41 AM, James Lynch <ashkashal@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Don't get me wrong I found his work stimulating several years ago and
>> >> also enjoyed Sam Harris's Moral Landscape and I cannot remember the
>> >> other (Atheist Manifesto maybe). I can relate heavily with much of the
>> >> conversation and the plight but, alas, an Atheist I am not, the world
>> >> is not so convenient as to provide me a package to quite swallow
>> >> though I take bites here and there of a variety. :)
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, rigsy03 <rigsy03@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Really? I don't- he has a wonderful playfulness with our language and
>> >> > can "zing" with the best of them. He has to protect his intellectual
>> >> > turf, afterall, plus who can resist anyone with any sort of
>> >> > connection
>> >> > to "Dr. Who"?
>> >> >
>> >> > I am not a celebrity therefore my opinions are probably meaningless.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sep 19, 10:08 pm, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> I find Dawkins a bit too arrogant for my taste, I would really like
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> know what you think instead.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:39 PM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > You might want to check out Richard Dawkins who has covered
>> >> >> > several
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > our topics.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Sep 19, 11:09 am, James Lynch <ashkas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at
>> >> >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the
>> >> >> >> world
>> >> >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their
>> >> >> >> potential
>> >> >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <rigs...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but
>> >> >> >> > kept
>> >> >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > first
>> >> >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the
>> >> >> >> > "assembly
>> >> >> >> > line".- Hide quoted text -
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> >
>
>