yes I have followed your confused challenging statements demanding that God follow your will in order for you to accept him.. What really confuses me why you think you are so important that he should respond to your demands?,, like it or not that is how I read your statements,,
Allan
--
(
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, RP Si eist , I am only admitting that
due to my beliefs I might appear to be so. As for challenging God to a
duel , I think you either have not been following my posts or you have
failed to understand me.When, whatever I think , feel and do is
according to God's will , I don't see how I can deemed to be
challenging Him. But , of course, if you are God I could be
challenging you and I agree with you that there is no need for you to
accept my challenge.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a man who claims to be an atheist you sure talk a lot about God. It
> sounds like you challenging God to a duel with you trying to set the rules?
> What I don't understand is why would he accept your challenge?
> Allan
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:04 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A man jumps from a plane without a parachute and when he reaches a
>> great velocity God exercises His choice and drastically slows his
>> fall. Funny Vam , isn't it ? Again God exercises His choice and
>> cancels all His laws and there is mayhem ! Or better still , at times
>> there are laws and at times there are none. God keeps on exercising
>> His choice and man keeps on playing the fool , he doesn't get wet in
>> the pool and doesn't get burned in the fire. Imagine a world without
>> God's laws , a world in which He keeps on exercising His choice.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Vam <atewari2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > A choiceless God is shite...
>> > So there goes all such pontification !
>> >
>> > #DeepakMRanade's article "Uncovering Relative Truths"
>> > in @timesofindia neatly summarises the approach to Advaita,
>> > its conceptual layout. You are invited to discover the answers.
>> >
>> >
>> > http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2012/01/19&PageLabel=18&EntityId=Ar01803&ViewMode=HTML
>> >
>> > On Jan 19, 10:21 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Interesting RP. I'm atheist only in that I reject stories that are
>> >> full of holes, talking snakes and such. The Gnostics have it that
>> >> creation was a mistake - though I have no means to determine any truth
>> >> in this I am struck most argument can be undercut like this. I often
>> >> wonder what might explain why we don't just know what life is about
>> >> and how this might be explained.
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 19, 10:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > I as a human have the choice , even if it is apparent and not real ,
>> >> > to do this or do that , that is, there is an element of uncertainty
>> >> > in
>> >> > my actions , but God has a steadfastness of purpose. God's will is
>> >> > sure and certain , the whole space-time continuum emanates from Him
>> >> > without any active choice on His part which raises the question of
>> >> > responsibility. God cannot be held responsible for any event as it
>> >> > happens without any wavering on His part , He has no choice and hence
>> >> > cannot be held responsible. This brings us to the question of
>> >> > worship , why worship a Being who has a fixed purpose ? In that case
>> >> > ,
>> >> > even though believing in a supreme Being and determinism , I can be
>> >> > called an atheist.
>
>
>
>
> --
> (
> )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
>
(
)
|_D Allan
Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.


0 comentários:
Postar um comentário