due to my beliefs I might appear to be so. As for challenging God to a
duel , I think you either have not been following my posts or you have
failed to understand me.When, whatever I think , feel and do is
according to God's will , I don't see how I can deemed to be
challenging Him. But , of course, if you are God I could be
challenging you and I agree with you that there is no need for you to
accept my challenge.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a man who claims to be an atheist you sure talk a lot about God. It
> sounds like you challenging God to a duel with you trying to set the rules?
> What I don't understand is why would he accept your challenge?
> Allan
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:04 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A man jumps from a plane without a parachute and when he reaches a
>> great velocity God exercises His choice and drastically slows his
>> fall. Funny Vam , isn't it ? Again God exercises His choice and
>> cancels all His laws and there is mayhem ! Or better still , at times
>> there are laws and at times there are none. God keeps on exercising
>> His choice and man keeps on playing the fool , he doesn't get wet in
>> the pool and doesn't get burned in the fire. Imagine a world without
>> God's laws , a world in which He keeps on exercising His choice.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Vam <atewari2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > A choiceless God is shite...
>> > So there goes all such pontification !
>> >
>> > #DeepakMRanade's article "Uncovering Relative Truths"
>> > in @timesofindia neatly summarises the approach to Advaita,
>> > its conceptual layout. You are invited to discover the answers.
>> >
>> >
>> > http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2012/01/19&PageLabel=18&EntityId=Ar01803&ViewMode=HTML
>> >
>> > On Jan 19, 10:21 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Interesting RP. I'm atheist only in that I reject stories that are
>> >> full of holes, talking snakes and such. The Gnostics have it that
>> >> creation was a mistake - though I have no means to determine any truth
>> >> in this I am struck most argument can be undercut like this. I often
>> >> wonder what might explain why we don't just know what life is about
>> >> and how this might be explained.
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 19, 10:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > I as a human have the choice , even if it is apparent and not real ,
>> >> > to do this or do that , that is, there is an element of uncertainty
>> >> > in
>> >> > my actions , but God has a steadfastness of purpose. God's will is
>> >> > sure and certain , the whole space-time continuum emanates from Him
>> >> > without any active choice on His part which raises the question of
>> >> > responsibility. God cannot be held responsible for any event as it
>> >> > happens without any wavering on His part , He has no choice and hence
>> >> > cannot be held responsible. This brings us to the question of
>> >> > worship , why worship a Being who has a fixed purpose ? In that case
>> >> > ,
>> >> > even though believing in a supreme Being and determinism , I can be
>> >> > called an atheist.
>
>
>
>
> --
> (
> )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
>
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário