different universes and also all laws might differ from universe to
universe , we might have conical heavenly bodies in one universe and
cylindrical in another. Laws of motion and all other laws might differ
because laws have been made by the Spirit , God or Nature and as such
different laws may hold good in different universes.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:43 AM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
> NASA has come up with an onboard clock to allow navigation 'without
> phoning home'. The development of clocks is associated with
> terrestrial navigation needs. Had the French had decent ones towards
> the end of the 18th century they would not have turned left too soon
> and landed in Ireland and English may have become a very minor
> language. I rather regret our lack of decent cafe society. The
> enormity of creation is - well enormous. My own sense of it isn't
> very technical. I suspect focus on origin may be a mistake and the
> quest may concern what we can become.
>
> On Apr 13, 12:45 am, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> timeless
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2:33 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Actually the only time that exist is the present "The hand of time writes
>> > and haven written moves on"
>>
>> > There are people that feel time does not even exist.
>> > Allan
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > > To be very short.. i dont understand where time past goes.... is it there?
>> > > .... i cant .. i have tried to understand.. i am not able to... what is
>> > > time lapsing into.. or what is lapsing?... leave out memory... its our
>> > > memory that gives this linear impression.. how does someone without
>> > > memory.. feel time? ... can we concieve of any being without memory
>>
>> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:24 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >> At this particular moment my universe is in a certain stage and
>> > >> infinite parallel universes are in their respective stages , to me
>> > >> time is a sense of elapsing but how you define time is not clear ,
>> > >> would you care to elucidate ?
>>
>> > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:29 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Pat explained to me once that there is little possibility of a parallel
>> > >> > universe.. he said it would be waste of energy.. though i cant be
>> > >> exactly
>> > >> > sure of what he said... I cant explain as well as him... How would you
>> > >> > explain time in parallel universes..
>>
>> > >> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:45 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >> >> It is logical to think that at any given moment there are infinite no.
>> > >> of
>> > >> >> universes in parallel, and when an universe disintegrates it vanishes
>> > >> into
>> > >> >> nothingness along with the space in which it subsists. That is , space
>> > >> is
>> > >> >> not permanent but only part of the universe.
>>
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > EverComing
>>
>> > > --
>> > > EverComing
>>
>> > --
>> > (
>> > )
>> > |_D Allan
>>
>> > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário