Re: Mind's Eye Creation

How about NOW...

On Apr 14, 8:09 am, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 7:54 am, rigsy03 <rigs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > You still need to start from somewhere to become.
>
> How about, wherever and howsoever one might be !
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 12, 7:13 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > NASA has come up with an onboard clock to allow navigation 'without
> > > phoning home'.  The development of clocks is associated with
> > > terrestrial navigation needs.  Had the French had decent ones towards
> > > the end of the 18th century they would not have turned left too soon
> > > and landed in Ireland and English may have become a very minor
> > > language.  I rather regret our lack of decent cafe society.  The
> > > enormity of creation is - well enormous.  My own sense of it isn't
> > > very technical.  I suspect focus on origin may be a mistake and the
> > > quest may concern what we can become.
>
> > > On Apr 13, 12:45 am, Molly <mollyb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > timeless
>
> > > > On Apr 12, 2:33 pm, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Actually the only time that exist is the present "The hand of time writes
> > > > > and haven written  moves on"
>
> > > > > There are people that feel time does not even exist.
> > > > > Allan
>
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > To be very short.. i dont understand where time past goes.... is it there?
> > > > > > .... i cant .. i have tried to understand.. i am not able to... what is
> > > > > > time lapsing into.. or what is lapsing?... leave out memory... its our
> > > > > > memory that gives this linear impression.. how does someone without
> > > > > > memory.. feel time? ... can we concieve of any being without memory
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:24 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> At this particular moment my universe is in a certain stage and
> > > > > >> infinite parallel universes are in their respective stages , to me
> > > > > >> time is a sense of elapsing but how you define time is not clear ,
> > > > > >> would you care to elucidate ?
>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:29 PM, pol.science kid <r.freeb...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > Pat explained to me once that there is little possibility of a parallel
> > > > > >> > universe.. he said it would be waste of energy.. though i cant be
> > > > > >> exactly
> > > > > >> > sure of what he said... I cant explain as well as him...  How would you
> > > > > >> > explain time in parallel universes..
>
> > > > > >> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:45 PM, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> >> It is logical to think that at any given moment there are infinite no.
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >> >> universes in parallel, and when an universe disintegrates it vanishes
> > > > > >> into
> > > > > >> >> nothingness along with the space in which it subsists. That is , space
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >> >> not permanent but only part of the universe.
>
> > > > > >> > --
> > > > > >> > EverComing
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > EverComing
>
> > > > > --
> > > > >  (
> > > > >   )
> > > > > |_D Allan
>
> > > > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -