There are many people that have no choice but to fast, RP and it is not a light matter but a very serious one, these people have no choice but starvation and trying to survive by chewing on raw leather and thirst is quenched by dirty water.. don't tell me about your free will.. tell me about those people free choice and what you are doing to make sure thay have the free choice you enjoy. Or maybe give all of your free choice food and drink to some one who has none.. and give it to them in person,, and not cheat by sneaking in some food for your self.. because it is your free will not to eat.. oh yes watch them share it with others so they to have some thing to eat.
Watch out though you might learn something.. and yes feeding others is a valid reason.
let me know when you start and I will help you keep track of the days passing,, but you have to be honest.. with both me and yourself..
Allan
--
(
-- On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:56 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
Taking a glass of water immediately or delaying it for some time is
not a biological need but a choice , sitting on a hunger strike for
days is not a biological need but a choice. Humans have this freedom
to forego biological needs and fast unto death for various causes . I
ask you Allan to introspect a little and see wherein lies your free
choice and where the malicious intent.
> --
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your logic is not valid RP you just think it is biological needs fall under
> the category of free choice.. they are just physical needs not choices and
> they have nothing to do with god dictating what you have to do ... But for
> you in your state of confusion as to what what free choice is, I guess you
> could call it free choice if you want..
> Replying to your response is a free choice, not a biological need. Do you
> see and understand the difference RP?
> Allan
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:37 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am feeling thirsty and I can choose to quench my thirst or delay it
>> for some time , but why do I choose one and not the other ---simple, I
>> have to follow God's will as if it was my choice i.e. free choice.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdouglas@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Indeed! Or I am thirsty and choose to get a drink later, or it is time
>> > for
>> > lunch but I choose to finish composing this one email before I choose to
>> > go
>> > eat.
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, 14 August 2012 12:48:05 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I feel thirsty and go and take a glass of water , it is time for lunch
>> >> and I go and have it --- this is freedom of choice ,consciously
>> >> knowing and acting out the act.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Lee Douglas <leerev...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > You speak as if we had no choice, and that we simply obey the
>> >> > programing
>> >> > of
>> >> > our bodies.
>> >> >
>> >> > I do get what you mean, I disagree, I think you wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > We are again just going around in circles you and I RP, we must
>> >> > endevour
>> >> > to
>> >> > brake it.
>> >> >
>> >> > So in an attempt at just that let me try it this way.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let us stick to the machine analogy.
>> >> >
>> >> > If we humans are simply biological machines, what machine are we akin
>> >> > to?
>> >> >
>> >> > Clockwork?
>> >> >
>> >> > With a clock work device you have not many veriables, and things must
>> >> > be
>> >> > wound up in order for the machin to work, a period of winding,
>> >> > working
>> >> > and
>> >> > winding again must occour for the mahcine to work.
>> >> > So unlike a clockwork machine then.
>> >> >
>> >> > Electirical.
>> >> > In an electrical machine you need power source, and input settings
>> >> > for
>> >> > an
>> >> > external force to imput commands, or changes.
>> >> > So not unlike but not too similar to electric machines then.
>> >> >
>> >> > Compturised machines.
>> >> > The heart and soul of the computerised machine is the cpu, the memory
>> >> > and
>> >> > the programing.
>> >> > So maybe we are more akin to the computerised machine that the other
>> >> > two?
>> >> >
>> >> > Or may be a little of each?
>> >> >
>> >> > We can say that the human machine is a self diagnosing, self reparing
>> >> > machine. But all of this is down to the programing. We have some at
>> >> > birth,
>> >> > let us call this predisposition, but the majority of it is picked up
>> >> > as
>> >> > we
>> >> > grow in a particular enviroment, but the more complex the machine the
>> >> > more
>> >> > complex the programing needs to be. As we are constantly adding to
>> >> > our
>> >> > programing via external enviromental influences, there needs be a way
>> >> > to
>> >> > sort the dross from the gold. Indeed there is, our programing over
>> >> > the
>> >> > eons
>> >> > has developed a 'conciousness'. This conciousness is what we use to
>> >> > sotrt
>> >> > and refine our programing, and conciouness being what it is, is
>> >> > capable
>> >> > deciding from distinct and differant possibilites, this ability then
>> >> > is
>> >> > freedom of choice. Our conciouness uses many tools in which to do
>> >> > this,
>> >> > morality and will amongst them, and of course it also takes note of
>> >> > any
>> >> > predispositions.
>> >> >
>> >> > We may be machines but we are conciouse, and it is this in which we
>> >> > find
>> >> > our
>> >> > Self's burried.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tuesday, 14 August 2012 11:46:19 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What you think and do is you as a organism that is responsible , but
>> >> >> you the organism are made of matter and it is from matter that all
>> >> >> enterprise arise , as such all your actions arise from the working
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> your body and brain which also reacts to the outside environment.
>> >> >> Through CBT it is the organism which is repairing itself and you are
>> >> >> the puppet in the hands of this material body. You are the Front but
>> >> >> are made to feel that you are all in all.
>> >> >> Thoughts and actions arise from bio-chemical activity and the self
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> under the impression that he is free.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Lee Douglas <leerev...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Okay there are two points on this.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yes of course genetic predisposition exists, but you make a
>> >> >> > mistake
>> >> >> > when
>> >> >> > you
>> >> >> > claim the strengh of it. It could be that a man is predisposed to
>> >> >> > cancer.
>> >> >> > What this means is it is more likely that as he gets older his
>> >> >> > chance
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > some cells becomeing cancerous is higher then the man who has no
>> >> >> > genetic
>> >> >> > predisposition towards cancer; what it is not, is a 100% garentee.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > In a similar vein it may be that I am predisposed towards my
>> >> >> > choice
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > child
>> >> >> > rearing, but this is not a garentee that I will never smack my
>> >> >> > child.
>> >> >> > Genetic predisposition, not genetic garentee.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Secondly.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yes all thought arises as a concequences of the mechanics of the
>> >> >> > brain,
>> >> >> > how
>> >> >> > can it be otherwise. Yet what CBT does and meditaion and a hell
>> >> >> > of a
>> >> >> > lot of
>> >> >> > mind exsercises is to elicit a physical change within the brain to
>> >> >> > complete
>> >> >> > a physcolgical change. You have a circular effect happing.
>> >> >> > Thought
>> >> >> > is
>> >> >> > made
>> >> >> > by the mechanics of the brain, we know that damage to the brain
>> >> >> > causes
>> >> >> > changes to the pyscology of the human. Yet the tought 'I wish to
>> >> >> > change'
>> >> >> > can make a physical change to the brain. Change to will in
>> >> >> > accordance
>> >> >> > with
>> >> >> > will.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Monday, 13 August 2012 17:12:33 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Whatever we think and whatever we do arises as a consequence of
>> >> >> >> neural
>> >> >> >> activity which precede the thought processes or rather the
>> >> >> >> thought
>> >> >> >> processes are a projection of this activity. When we are offered
>> >> >> >> psycho-therapy our brain reacts to it first and the thought
>> >> >> >> process
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> just the consequence , the efforts we make are a result of brain
>> >> >> >> activity which precede them. What are we without our genes ?
>> >> >> >> just
>> >> >> >> nothing! What are we without the universe ? again nothing !
>> >> >> >> Predisposition is just that, an inclination, without which there
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> no
>> >> >> >> beginning. You have to start from somewhere and you don't do that
>> >> >> >> from
>> >> >> >> scratch , you have your predisposition.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Lee Douglas
>> >> >> >> <leerev...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Sorry RP, I have to call bullshit on this as you know I would.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > You talk about genetic predisposition and envirmental learning
>> >> >> >> > as
>> >> >> >> > if
>> >> >> >> > these
>> >> >> >> > are rock solid. Let us for just a second remember the power of
>> >> >> >> > words
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > say that a predispostion is exaclty that, not a hard solid rule
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > learnt
>> >> >> >> > behavour can of course be unlearnt.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > When a man goes to a mind doctor for reasons of what ever
>> >> >> >> > meantl
>> >> >> >> > health
>> >> >> >> > problems plauge him, he may be offerd CBT as an aid to getting
>> >> >> >> > his
>> >> >> >> > head
>> >> >> >> > back
>> >> >> >> > in order. How is it that these technichs work if we are really
>> >> >> >> > all
>> >> >> >> > fully
>> >> >> >> > bound and fetterd by our genes and our enviroment?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Monday, 13 August 2012 11:54:12 UTC+1, RP Singh wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> What I would do is limited to my nature and as Lee and I are
>> >> >> >> >> made
>> >> >> >> >> up
>> >> >> >> >> differently his choice would be different , but that would be
>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> line
>> >> >> >> >> with the choice towards which he is genetically predisposed or
>> >> >> >> >> environmentally learned. What I mean is that will is a
>> >> >> >> >> consequence
>> >> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> >> thought processes which end up in making a choice.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:22 PM, AmandaRheen
>> >> >> >> >> <Machiav...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > What I understand you to be saying is merely that free will
>> >> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> >> > limited
>> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> >> > the number of possible choices that are available to the
>> >> >> >> >> > organism
>> >> >> >> >> > within
>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> > total capacities of the material matter of the organism.
>> >> >> >> >> > The
>> >> >> >> >> > part
>> >> >> >> >> > where
>> >> >> >> >> > you
>> >> >> >> >> > stop making sense to me is
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > " If you think that is freedom , then you are really the
>> >> >> >> >> > master of yourself. " in context of the example you used
>> >> >> >> >> > with
>> >> >> >> >> > Lee.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > That is "where I would have
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > beaten up a child mercilessly you would not have because
>> >> >> >> >> > you
>> >> >> >> >> > are
>> >> >> >> >> > not
>> >> >> >> >> > free , if you think you are go ahead and shoot up your enemy
>> >> >> >> >> > ,
>> >> >> >> >> > but
>> >> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > course you would not because your reason would stop you
>> >> >> >> >> > where
>> >> >> >> >> > mine
>> >> >> >> >> > would not."
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > What does 'if you think that is freedom, the you are really
>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> > master
>> >> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > yourself' mean?
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:53:49 PM UTC+10, RP Singh
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> The will to change yourself comes from within you , but
>> >> >> >> >> >> those
>> >> >> >> >> >> who
>> >> >> >> >> >> are
>> >> >> >> >> >> ignorant of the intricacies of nature think that they have
>> >> >> >> >> >> brought
>> >> >> >> >> >> about this change. When you breathe you think that you are
>> >> >> >> >> >> freely
>> >> >> >> >> >> doing so but the fact is that it is your body which is
>> >> >> >> >> >> demanding
>> >> >> >> >> >> it.
>> >> >> >> >> >> Whether you are controlling your anger or not is in your
>> >> >> >> >> >> hands
>> >> >> >> >> >> but
>> >> >> >> >> >> your decisions arise from the working of your brain which
>> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> matter
>> >> >> >> >> >> and as such governed by neurological or biological
>> >> >> >> >> >> principles.
>> >> >> >> >> >> If
>> >> >> >> >> >> freedom was real the whole machinery of the universe would
>> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> >> >> collapsed and there would have been mayhem everywhere , but
>> >> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> not the case and wherever you look you find harmony within.
>> >> >> >> >> >> Whatever
>> >> >> >> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> >> man does it is his nature expressing itself , where I would
>> >> >> >> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> >> >> beaten up a child mercilessly you would not have because
>> >> >> >> >> >> you
>> >> >> >> >> >> are
>> >> >> >> >> >> not
>> >> >> >> >> >> free , if you think you are go ahead and shoot up your
>> >> >> >> >> >> enemy ,
>> >> >> >> >> >> but
>> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> >> >> course you would not because your reason would stop you
>> >> >> >> >> >> where
>> >> >> >> >> >> mine
>> >> >> >> >> >> would not. If you think that is freedom , then you are
>> >> >> >> >> >> really
>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> master of yourself.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> (
> )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
(
)
|_D Allan
Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário