Re: Mind's Eye Re: Aliens, Slavery and Resources

Gabby one of the major deference between me and christianity is I see
God as what makes up my being,, I do not see God as being else where.
I am expected to live up to my beliefs not making excuses to justify
violating those rules.
Allan

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:24 PM, gabbydott <gabbydott@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, hi Molly! Yes, it's true, I dared to read the bible on the same
> level as fairy tales. My Protestant nature, I guess. Going out,
> looking out, speaking out is part of that tradition too. What is it in
> your life that makes you being different?
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Molly <mollyb363@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking for God outside oneself can lead to magical gang gods at a level
>> where only the fit and corrupt survive. Many fairy tales are imbued with
>> mystical thinking, including the bible.
>>
>>
>> On Monday, October 29, 2012 5:20:17 AM UTC-4, gabbydott wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know why these far-away and up-above gods and godesses never
>>> really made it into my heart. Maybe the down-to-earth fairy tales
>>> resembled my surroundings much more. It gives me the creeps when
>>> little street gangstas are referring to Nemesis and believe they have
>>> got the key to the kingdom now.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:35 AM, rigsy03 <rig...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> > I pray to a God everyday but am not sure which one. He is male and
>>> > seems helpful. Today he bolstered my strength rearranging some
>>> > furniture then rebolstered me moving stuff back as it was. However, I
>>> > cooked a hearty meal of steak, potatoes and asparagus for insurance.//
>>> > I think the Greek and Roman gods and goddesses represent human nature
>>> > and traits- really provide some valuable insights for mere mortals.
>>> >
>>> > On Oct 28, 12:45 pm, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Ah Lee, by that time you would have forgotten where you were coming
>>> >> from!
>>> >>
>>> >> I like monotheism, because it supports my view of myself as an
>>> >> individual. And it allows me to act upon it as such. I am aware that I
>>> >> am a social being though. Polytheism would be able to account for
>>> >> that, but would probably only confuse me.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Well that is true Rigsy, and perhaps your prediction is also true.
>>> >> > However
>>> >> > religious faith is 'unreasonable' belief. As it is my stance that we
>>> >> > all
>>> >> > hold to some of these along the way, then perhaps it is a wholly
>>> >> > human/sentient being trait and we'll not be rid of it, only time will
>>> >> > tell.
>>> >> > Just one of the reasons I want to reach at least 400 years old.
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:52:50 PM UTC, rigsy03 wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> Really? What about the Italian scientists who face prison time for
>>> >> >> failing to predict the severity of an earthquake? What harmony under
>>> >> >> the mantle of monotheism? Science and technology will make god(s)
>>> >> >> obsolete and society can still be managed through various value
>>> >> >> systems based on new realities and methods of control. Presently, we
>>> >> >> are trying to integrate two oppositional positions which accounts
>>> >> >> for
>>> >> >> a good amount of absurdity and disappointment. As extinct creatures
>>> >> >> might have warned us, sentimentality is deadly.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> On Oct 28, 2:12 am, Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> > I really do not see much beyond monotheism atheism holds little
>>> >> >> > but
>>> >> >> > wishful madness, and as for polytheism the universes would be
>>> >> >> > totally
>>> >> >> > different.. Just doesn't work.. You are right arrogance is a
>>> >> >> > tremendous problem which I seriously doubt man will over come..
>>> >> >> > those
>>> >> >> > that are arrogant have little reason to change.. It is the
>>> >> >> > monotheism
>>> >> >> > that keeps some what harmony,, the problems I see come from man
>>> >> >> > changing the laws of God that have been handed down through the
>>> >> >> > generations .. It seems these changes are really designed to
>>> >> >> > benefit
>>> >> >> > them and their goals.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > without a singular God there would be no harmony even with in
>>> >> >> > nature
>>> >> >> > and the predictability of science would disappear.
>>> >> >> > Allan
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:12 AM, James <ashkas...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> > > I agree with S. W. Hawking where this is unknown territory, we
>>> >> >> > > have a
>>> >> >> > > tendency to being destructive and careless. We must evolve if we
>>> >> >> > > wish
>>> >> >> > > to
>>> >> >> > > survive, boldly while trying to work out that Achilles heel
>>> >> >> > > (arrogance).
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > > Allan I was thinking similarly in part, I am not so sure
>>> >> >> > > monotheism is
>>> >> >> > > for
>>> >> >> > > everyone though. Where people can devise stories to fit a niche
>>> >> >> > > in
>>> >> >> > > nature,
>>> >> >> > > then further reconcile from that I think there is much less to
>>> >> >> > > say on
>>> >> >> > > God
>>> >> >> > > than people might, it may even be sacrilege to do so. In the
>>> >> >> > > sense of
>>> >> >> > > attempting authority on the nameless, a belligerent act so to
>>> >> >> > > speak.
>>> >> >> > > Agrarian civilization, centralization of authority, and cultural
>>> >> >> > > homogeneity
>>> >> >> > > (dare add monotheism) have allowed us to achieve major
>>> >> >> > > advancements
>>> >> >> > > but I
>>> >> >> > > question that we are approaching or even on track with a
>>> >> >> > > 'destination
>>> >> >> > > truth'. It seems we are a hollow shell filled with culture, but
>>> >> >> > > shouldn't it
>>> >> >> > > be the other way around?!
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > > I keep looking, but I'm just not seeing that 10% innovation in
>>> >> >> > > the
>>> >> >> > > population, there is some serious parasitic drag somewhere in
>>> >> >> > > our
>>> >> >> > > equations.
>>> >> >> > > Sorry so subjective tonight Al. :)
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > > On 10/26/2012 1:12 PM, Allan H wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> The foundations of most of the religions are not that far
>>> >> >> > >> apart.. it
>>> >> >> > >> is
>>> >> >> > >> the interpretation of them that gets the idea screwed up.. It
>>> >> >> > >> seems
>>> >> >> > >> though that the creator places people that have a better link
>>> >> >> > >> and can
>>> >> >> > >> help straighten the cultures so there is hope as to maintain
>>> >> >> > >> the
>>> >> >> > >> same
>>> >> >> > >> ideas. so I think that there us a very real possibility that
>>> >> >> > >> common
>>> >> >> > >> ground is available.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> poking a nd prodding out of curiosity is to be expected it is
>>> >> >> > >> called
>>> >> >> > >> curiosity.
>>> >> >> > >> Allan
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> On Oct 26, 2012 3:18 PM, "Lee Douglas" <leerevdoug...@gmail.com
>>> >> >> > >> <mailto:leerevdoug...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Ohhh I don't know Andrew.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> As I have said we can of course speculate on all sorts of
>>> >> >> > >> things
>>> >> >> > >> about alien life, but seeing as we can only ever think
>>> >> >> > >> about from
>>> >> >> > >> our particular species POV, I question how useful such
>>> >> >> > >> speculation
>>> >> >> > >> would be. I think the most logical deduction we could make
>>> >> >> > >> is to
>>> >> >> > >> say 'Well I really don't know', and that is indeed my line.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Heh of course having said that and in the spirit of pure
>>> >> >> > >> speculation, given that our current understanding of
>>> >> >> > >> universal
>>> >> >> > >> principles, and laws of physics etc.. seem to encompass the
>>> >> >> > >> totality
>>> >> >> > >> of the universe, I do not think it incorrect to draw some
>>> >> >> > >> speculative conclusions.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Would alien lifeforms be carbon based as on our planet? I
>>> >> >> > >> suspect probably yes, but there are reasons enough to
>>> >> >> > >> suppose
>>> >> >> > >> otherwise also.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Would then non carbon life forms form different morality
>>> >> >> > >> than
>>> >> >> > >> carbon
>>> >> >> > >> based life forms? Umm well I'm going with 'I don't know'
>>> >> >> > >> for
>>> >> >> > >> this
>>> >> >> > >> one, as I lack an in depth understanding of neurology.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> As a theist who believes in a single creator God though I
>>> >> >> > >> would
>>> >> >> > >> have
>>> >> >> > >> to agree with Allan.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> A large part of my struggle is with the message of God.
>>> >> >> > >> Trying
>>> >> >> > >> to
>>> >> >> > >> recompense different religions with this single message is
>>> >> >> > >> hard.
>>> >> >> > >> I
>>> >> >> > >> try to imagine that all religions are valid and look for
>>> >> >> > >> the similarities, I rather suspect as I grow I will have to
>>> >> >> > >> claim
>>> >> >> > >> that some are wholly false and man made whilst others are
>>> >> >> > >> the direct message from God albeit fucked with by mankind
>>> >> >> > >> for his
>>> >> >> > >> own nefarious ends(Christianity for example). So then the
>>> >> >> > >> job
>>> >> >> > >> becomes separating the wheat from the chaff, as it were.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> How would intelligent alien life cope with God's message I
>>> >> >> > >> wonder,
>>> >> >> > >> and would they be in the boat as we? Perhaps they have no
>>> >> >> > >> idea of
>>> >> >> > >> a
>>> >> >> > >> God at all? Or perhaps they may be the only beings who
>>> >> >> > >> hold to
>>> >> >> > >> the
>>> >> >> > >> truth? Ahhh once again, I'm forced to say I don't know.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Let us endeavour to understand the other sentient creatures
>>> >> >> > >> we
>>> >> >> > >> share
>>> >> >> > >> this planet with first, then just maybe we can make better
>>> >> >> > >> educated
>>> >> >> > >> guesses.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Heh yes you can assume from that I am in favour of granting
>>> >> >> > >> personhood upon those 'higher order' animals, enshrouded in
>>> >> >> > >> law.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> On Friday, 26 October 2012 10:22:52 UTC+1, andrew vecsey
>>> >> >> > >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> I agree. Extra terrestrial visitors to earth would not
>>> >> >> > >> be
>>> >> >> > >> comparable to us. They would have different values and
>>> >> >> > >> morals.
>>> >> >> > >> They would find all life sacred and would respect it,
>>> >> >> > >> no
>>> >> >> > >> matter
>>> >> >> > >> how depraved or primitive. Perhaps they were the ones
>>> >> >> > >> who
>>> >> >> > >> seeded
>>> >> >> > >> earth in the first place. They would probably recognize
>>> >> >> > >> our
>>> >> >> > >> weaknesses and would let us either survive to our next
>>> >> >> > >> stage
>>> >> >> > >> or
>>> >> >> > >> let us destroy ourselves.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:19:42 PM UTC+2,
>>> >> >> > >> William L.
>>> >> >> > >> Houts William L. Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> All right, I just wanted to run this by you guys.
>>> >> >> > >> I know
>>> >> >> > >> it
>>> >> >> > >> seems I'm
>>> >> >> > >> always rattlling on about aliens, but they're
>>> >> >> > >> really a
>>> >> >> > >> stand
>>> >> >> > >> in for,
>>> >> >> > >> well, for a lot of things. Anyway, I've been on
>>> >> >> > >> Facebook
>>> >> >> > >> and recently
>>> >> >> > >> made a status report commenting on the conversation
>>> >> >> > >> we
>>> >> >> > >> had
>>> >> >> > >> going on here
>>> >> >> > >> about hypothetical aliens and what they might or
>>> >> >> > >> might
>>> >> >> > >> not
>>> >> >> > >> want from
>>> >> >> > >> us. And I was making the point that I made here:
>>> >> >> > >> that
>>> >> >> > >> said
>>> >> >> > >> aliens will
>>> >> >> > >> turn out to be just as befuddled by it all as we
>>> >> >> > >> are, and
>>> >> >> > >> are probably
>>> >> >> > >> in no position to give us the goods on life's
>>> >> >> > >> mysteries,
>>> >> >> > >> or
>>> >> >> > >> even make a
>>> >> >> > >> good cocktail.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> > >> Now, my friend Matt, who is very smart but also
>>> >> >> > >> very
>>> >> >> > >> bitchy,
>>> >> >> > >> put forth
>>> >> >> > >> Professor Hawking's notion: that we'd better keep
>>> >> >> > >> our
>>> >> >> > >> heads
>>> >> >> > >> down low,
>>> >> >> > >> because history tells us that when a more
>>> >> >> > >> technologically
>>> >> >> > >> advanced
>>> >> >> > >> species meets a less developed one, the results are
>>> >> >> > >> usually
>>> >> >> > >> horrible for
>>> >> >> > >> the latter. I replied that yes, this does seem to
>>> >> >> > >> be the
>>> >> >> > >> pattern in
>>> >> >> > >> Earth history. But, I went on, races which manage
>>> >> >> > >> to
>>> >> >> > >> break
>>> >> >> > >> the
>>> >> >> > >> lightspeed barrier are going to have better things
>>> >> >> > >> to do
>>> >> >> > >> than enslave 7
>>> >> >> > >> billion people, or even mistreat them very much.
>>> >> >> > >> Their
>>> >> >> > >> energy problems,
>>> >> >> > >> I said more or less, will have been solved to such
>>> >> >> > >> an
>>> >> >> > >> extent
>>> >> >> > >> that they
>>> >>
>>> >> ...
>>> >>
>>> >> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>> >>
>>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>



--
(
)
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.


I am a Natural Airgunner -

Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.

--