On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
Poly because someone publishes something does not make it true,, it
makes it his opinion
You a re dealing with the paper of an atheist who is publishing what
he thinks is true.. It is no different that my saying what I think is
true.. For me what I say is valid... what I am finding from this
discussion group and a friend .. What I am finding is that there is a
God. and every one has a soul including mr dawkins and that soul is
what controls the body not unlike your body driving a car.. with the
body being the soul and and the car playing the part of the body..
You can take the idea from there
Allan
> --
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:58 PM, pol.science kid <r.freebird@gmail.com> wrote:
> whats the difference between reply and reply to all?..anyway... i browsed
> richard dawkins 'the god delusion' for a paper... in that he gives a case
> for Aliens being Gods.. i mean why cant they.. from our limited
> understanding..whats the difference..?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdouglas@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hahahah in my experience even the best of Queens can be a little prissy at
>> times.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 25 October 2012 07:03:26 UTC+1, William L. Houts William L.
>> Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OH, I agree with you about that. And it's basically the point I was
>>> trying to make to my irascible friend, Matthew. I don't think you solve
>>> your most difficult energy problems and go on to be a galactic terrorist.
>>> Terrorism is largely a strategy of the weak. And if you've mastered
>>> warp drive, then you probably have all kinds of toys available to you,
>>> including zero point energy or some equivalent.
>>>
>>> I just finished reading Matt's latest post on Facebook. He sang a
>>> waspish little aria about how I didn't understand reality and that he
>>> wasn't enjoying this conversation at ALL, and that he was hereby closing
>>> down his side of the argument. Matt really can be a pissy little queen
>>> sometimes.
>>>
>>>
>>> --Bill
>>>
>>> On 10/24/2012 10:01 AM, archytas wrote:
>>> > I find it hard to think technologically advanced beings would be
>>> > bastards Bill. The so-called trade of imperialism was actually
>>> > depraved - with concentration camps, limb-severing and so on. Queens
>>> > have to have their dramas mate! The aliens could be as bad as we have
>>> > been. It would be good to explore good aliens and what such a good
>>> > life might be. We could not, in current biological form, share it.
>>> > They might leave us with the means to change so we could. I'd choose
>>> > Damon Laplace's route in genetic change to travel the stars rather
>>> > than live a normal life span in an agrarian collective - but I'd
>>> > choose that over my current life in 'the economy'.
>>> >
>>> > In my least favourite episode of Voyager, Janeway refuses to drop her
>>> > knickers for the technology that will get her crew home. There could
>>> > be reasons for carrying a few casual queens in our crew! The quirks
>>> > thrown up in evolution usually have their uses.
>>> >
>>> > I think the chimps and dolphins ponder the human questions Lee. Many
>>> > animals, including chimps and scrub jays seem to hold 'funerals'.
>>> > Some clams live 500 years (off Iceland) without our angst. My ideal
>>> > aliens will have a rational hatred of soap opera.
>>> >
>>> > On 24 Oct, 16:23, Lee Douglas <leerevdoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I think that Human history shows that it is very hard to break out of
>>> >> 'modes of thought' that eon, geography and culture instill into us.
>>> >> How
>>> >> hard then to reason as a non Earthling would? I think the only viable
>>> >> answer to your question is to say, I don't know.
>>> >>
>>> >> Perhaps if we could get into the psyches of some of the other
>>> >> creatures
>>> >> that we share this planet with, we may find, or not, some
>>> >> similarities. It
>>> >> is an interesting question to ponder though. Does having
>>> >> a consciousness at a level sufficient enough to
>>> >> claim intelligence, inevitably lead to the asking of similar
>>> >> questions?
>>> >> Elephants, who I do belive to show a certain standard of
>>> >> emotional understanding and intelligence, do they ask 'Life! What's it
>>> >> all
>>> >> about?'
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 12:19:42 UTC+1, William L. Houts William
>>> >> L.
>>> >> Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> All right, I just wanted to run this by you guys. I know it seems
>>> >>> I'm
>>> >>> always rattlling on about aliens, but they're really a stand in for,
>>> >>> well, for a lot of things. Anyway, I've been on Facebook and
>>> >>> recently
>>> >>> made a status report commenting on the conversation we had going on
>>> >>> here
>>> >>> about hypothetical aliens and what they might or might not want from
>>> >>> us. And I was making the point that I made here: that said aliens
>>> >>> will
>>> >>> turn out to be just as befuddled by it all as we are, and are
>>> >>> probably
>>> >>> in no position to give us the goods on life's mysteries, or even make
>>> >>> a
>>> >>> good cocktail.
>>> >>> Now, my friend Matt, who is very smart but also very bitchy, put
>>> >>> forth
>>> >>> Professor Hawking's notion: that we'd better keep our heads down
>>> >>> low,
>>> >>> because history tells us that when a more technologically advanced
>>> >>> species meets a less developed one, the results are usually horrible
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> the latter. I replied that yes, this does seem to be the pattern in
>>> >>> Earth history. But, I went on, races which manage to break the
>>> >>> lightspeed barrier are going to have better things to do than enslave
>>> >>> 7
>>> >>> billion people, or even mistreat them very much. Their energy
>>> >>> problems,
>>> >>> I said more or less, will have been solved to such an extent that
>>> >>> they
>>> >>> won't have to vampirize us. Matt made it clear that he thought I was
>>> >>> being terrifically naive.
>>> >>> Now, Mat is quickly becoming a sour old queen, but I want to know:
>>> >>> with
>>> >>> whom would you agree? Or is there a third answer which I haven't
>>> >>> proposed here?
>>> >>> --Bill
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead
>>> >>> and boy are my arms tired."
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead
>>> and boy are my arms tired."
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> EverComing
>
>
>
>
--
(
)
|_D Allan
Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
I am a Natural Airgunner -
Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.
--
--
EverComing
--
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário