Re: Mind's Eye Instinct for survival

My apologies RP, due to what I consider trash I don't waste my time
carefully reading what you write..

Now I am wondering the origin of this vision.. ;o) I am waiting to read.
Allan


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
> me (RP Singh change) Post reply
>
> 4/26/10
> [Mind's Eye] Re: God and I
>
> Consciousness has to do with the senses and the sense-objects. Sight,
> hearing, etc. I see a door as grey in colour and at a distance of 25
> yards from me, does God see it as grey in colour and at a distance.
> No God is immanent in the door, he is the grey colour, he is the
> door , he is the distance and he is me ,the observer. God is in
> everything and is thus all-pervading , he is in every will and is
> therefore the real doer, he is in all beings and non-beings and is
> therefore omniscient.
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
>> gee I never read any thing by RP saying that God is the totality of
>> every thing..
>> Allan
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Lee Douglas <leerevdouglas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Heh okay then, RP and myself share the belife that God is the totaliy of
>>> everything, although we differ on some things we can at least agree on this.
>>>
>>> We Sikhs would express it thusly: 'Ik onkar, sat naam' losely translated as
>>> '1God, true name'. Now True Name, what does that mean? God's name is true,
>>> or truth? Or perhaps that God is true/truth?
>>>
>>> Personaly I would explain it this way. Before the begining, there was only
>>> God, but God in spirt, God said (to steal form the Bible) 'Let there
>>> be.....' and thus the creation was created. Matter from the spirt of God.
>>> Thus the totality of the universe is God, the reality is God and the truth
>>> is God. I heard it expressed just yesterday that God was Anaam (Nameless)
>>> and by atributing Naam to Godself the creation came into being. Not too far
>>> removed from the Hindu concept of Om I suppose.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:53:13 UTC, gabbydott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would know if it was different, if i understood what you meant, Lee!
>>>> Circling forwards in loops, arent we?
>>>>
>>>> Am 29.11.2012 15:02 schrieb "Lee Douglas" <leerev...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> (
>> )
>> |_D Allan
>>
>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>>
>>
>> I am a Natural Airgunner -
>>
>> Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>



--
(
)
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.


I am a Natural Airgunner -

Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.

--