Re: Mind's Eye Re: Intelligent Design

Instead of believing in an Intelligent designer if we believe that
Nature itself is inherently intelligent and things move on with an
intelligent purpose , which though not easily recognizable as such, is
in any case true may well be within your belief system , Neil. In
spite of mayhem caused by natural disasters life still moves on and
the fact that Nature will one day destroy all life and the universe
doesn't negate its intelligence. Growth doesn't move forward
continuously but after a certain stage decay starts creeping in.
Everything is born , grows , and dies and this is true for all
manifestations of Nature and doesn't negate its intelligent design.

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:57 AM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tend to agree RP, though I don't stretch to an intelligent designer
> other than as a possibility. We might be approaching a tipping point
> on the reason for existence.
>
> On 24 Dec, 18:29, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The systematic way in which this body is formed and works shows that there
>> is Intelligence in Nature and we won't be far wrong if we call it
>> Intelligent design. That which appears to be random choice is actually a
>> high level of Intelligence.
>
> --
>
>
>

--