Re: Mind's Eye Re: Intelligent Design

you are a very confusing person RP ..one moment you claim to be
enlightened with visions and deep spiritual convictions and here you
are desperately trying to prove you are an atheist,, and atheism is
acceptable .. or are you just a confused puppy not knowing where to
turn?
Have a good holiday
Allan

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:29 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of believing in an Intelligent designer if we believe that
> Nature itself is inherently intelligent and things move on with an
> intelligent purpose , which though not easily recognizable as such, is
> in any case true may well be within your belief system , Neil. In
> spite of mayhem caused by natural disasters life still moves on and
> the fact that Nature will one day destroy all life and the universe
> doesn't negate its intelligence. Growth doesn't move forward
> continuously but after a certain stage decay starts creeping in.
> Everything is born , grows , and dies and this is true for all
> manifestations of Nature and doesn't negate its intelligent design.
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:57 AM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I tend to agree RP, though I don't stretch to an intelligent designer
>> other than as a possibility. We might be approaching a tipping point
>> on the reason for existence.
>>
>> On 24 Dec, 18:29, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The systematic way in which this body is formed and works shows that there
>>> is Intelligence in Nature and we won't be far wrong if we call it
>>> Intelligent design. That which appears to be random choice is actually a
>>> high level of Intelligence.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>



--
(
)
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

Of course I talk to myself,
Sometimes I need expert advice..

--