Re: Mind's Eye Re: Intelligent Design

I don't understand your argument , but one thing is sure that I have
never claimed to have had visions. I have always believed in an undual
God , Nature or Atman which by my definition transcends awareness or
to be blunt is unconscious. I know you have never read my posts
carefully and thus your confusion regarding my statements and beliefs.

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry RP heard that discussion before over a coffee table in Florida
> some `25 years ago and the person laying forth the argument is a
> devote atheist argument and not new. simple one way to explain on
> going life and expanding knowledge,, one used by atheist..
> Now you are claiming that atheist believe in God.. verry confusing..
> Allan
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:36 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Allan , an atheist is a person who doesn't believe in intelligent
>> design. God and Nature are one and the same. Merry Christmas to you !
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> you are a very confusing person RP ..one moment you claim to be
>>> enlightened with visions and deep spiritual convictions and here you
>>> are desperately trying to prove you are an atheist,, and atheism is
>>> acceptable .. or are you just a confused puppy not knowing where to
>>> turn?
>>> Have a good holiday
>>> Allan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:29 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Instead of believing in an Intelligent designer if we believe that
>>>> Nature itself is inherently intelligent and things move on with an
>>>> intelligent purpose , which though not easily recognizable as such, is
>>>> in any case true may well be within your belief system , Neil. In
>>>> spite of mayhem caused by natural disasters life still moves on and
>>>> the fact that Nature will one day destroy all life and the universe
>>>> doesn't negate its intelligence. Growth doesn't move forward
>>>> continuously but after a certain stage decay starts creeping in.
>>>> Everything is born , grows , and dies and this is true for all
>>>> manifestations of Nature and doesn't negate its intelligent design.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:57 AM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I tend to agree RP, though I don't stretch to an intelligent designer
>>>>> other than as a possibility. We might be approaching a tipping point
>>>>> on the reason for existence.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Dec, 18:29, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The systematic way in which this body is formed and works shows that there
>>>>>> is Intelligence in Nature and we won't be far wrong if we call it
>>>>>> Intelligent design. That which appears to be random choice is actually a
>>>>>> high level of Intelligence.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> (
>>> )
>>> |_D Allan
>>>
>>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>>>
>>> Of course I talk to myself,
>>> Sometimes I need expert advice..
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> (
> )
> |_D Allan
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
> Of course I talk to myself,
> Sometimes I need expert advice..
>
> --
>
>
>

--