Re: Mind's Eye Re: Intelligent Design

You are funny RP the argument is simple you are an devote atheist
and before your statement is the exact argument that has been used
for generations of atheists... Why would I search for deeper meaning
in statements of what I consider foolishness.. for your reading
information what you are trying to say is involved in
transcendentalism.. that can go in many directions and in itself is
interesting.
You RP are the perfect Atheist by definition what is funnier you
don't know it.. lol
Allan

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:03 PM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand your argument , but one thing is sure that I have
> never claimed to have had visions. I have always believed in an undual
> God , Nature or Atman which by my definition transcends awareness or
> to be blunt is unconscious. I know you have never read my posts
> carefully and thus your confusion regarding my statements and beliefs.
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry RP heard that discussion before over a coffee table in Florida
>> some `25 years ago and the person laying forth the argument is a
>> devote atheist argument and not new. simple one way to explain on
>> going life and expanding knowledge,, one used by atheist..
>> Now you are claiming that atheist believe in God.. verry confusing..
>> Allan
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:36 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Allan , an atheist is a person who doesn't believe in intelligent
>>> design. God and Nature are one and the same. Merry Christmas to you !
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Allan H <allanh1946@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> you are a very confusing person RP ..one moment you claim to be
>>>> enlightened with visions and deep spiritual convictions and here you
>>>> are desperately trying to prove you are an atheist,, and atheism is
>>>> acceptable .. or are you just a confused puppy not knowing where to
>>>> turn?
>>>> Have a good holiday
>>>> Allan
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:29 AM, RP Singh <1234rp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Instead of believing in an Intelligent designer if we believe that
>>>>> Nature itself is inherently intelligent and things move on with an
>>>>> intelligent purpose , which though not easily recognizable as such, is
>>>>> in any case true may well be within your belief system , Neil. In
>>>>> spite of mayhem caused by natural disasters life still moves on and
>>>>> the fact that Nature will one day destroy all life and the universe
>>>>> doesn't negate its intelligence. Growth doesn't move forward
>>>>> continuously but after a certain stage decay starts creeping in.
>>>>> Everything is born , grows , and dies and this is true for all
>>>>> manifestations of Nature and doesn't negate its intelligent design.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:57 AM, archytas <nwterry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I tend to agree RP, though I don't stretch to an intelligent designer
>>>>>> other than as a possibility. We might be approaching a tipping point
>>>>>> on the reason for existence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 Dec, 18:29, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The systematic way in which this body is formed and works shows that there
>>>>>>> is Intelligence in Nature and we won't be far wrong if we call it
>>>>>>> Intelligent design. That which appears to be random choice is actually a
>>>>>>> high level of Intelligence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> (
>>>> )
>>>> |_D Allan
>>>>
>>>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>>>>
>>>> Of course I talk to myself,
>>>> Sometimes I need expert advice..
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> (
>> )
>> |_D Allan
>>
>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>>
>> Of course I talk to myself,
>> Sometimes I need expert advice..
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>



--
(
)
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

Of course I talk to myself,
Sometimes I need expert advice..

--