On Saturday, January 26, 2013 2:15:25 PM UTC+1, archytas wrote:
.......I think we know--
what the right things to do are but are scared of our impotence -
understanding more of why might help.
On Jan 26, 10:14 am, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In present tense it means acknowledging the massive amount of illnesses,
> deaths and general deformation of humanness because of a protestant work
> ethics that serves very much the one and less the many. I hope you can
> decipher my shorthand by now.
>
> 2013/1/26 Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yes and no one is more or less past tense the other is on going,
> > one killing was based off racial superiority,, the other killing is
> > based off religious superiority,
> > Whats the difference.. ??
>
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The other serving as a better example of wickedness is a classic, Allan.
>
> > > 2013/1/26 Allan H <allanh1...@gmail.com>
>
> > >> A better example Riggs and sadly enough is Islam in today's world..
> > >> This is evidenced in all the news reports of the day.
>
> > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:43 AM, rigs <rigs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > The Nazis seem an obvious example of fairly recent history- that's all
> > >> > I meant- and history is littered with examples as explicated by
> > >> > Archytas. It's as if the majority gets caught up in a wave- to use
> > >> > Molly's image. Though there may be concrete reasons at the base, it is
> > >> > often an irrational reaction. My point is that when dissent is
> > >> > silenced, democracy is in trouble.
>
> > >> > On Jan 25, 1:25 pm, Gabby <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Ah, rigs. :( Where is Molly by the way?
> > >> >> Let's give the majority opinion problem a hearty positive spin and
> > say:
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> majority of Germans is happy that the majority of Americans is
> > happily
> > >> >> forming their opinions in America and exchange it over there. :)
>
> > >> >> On Friday, January 25, 2013 2:03:29 PM UTC+1, rigs wrote:
>
> > >> >> > And very often their very existence does depend upon going along
> > with
> > >> >> > the majority. However, one feature of democracy is that of dissent
> > >> >> > but
> > >> >> > it can be risky esp. if the majority has a mob mentality. When you
> > >> >> > think of the average classroom it is obvious that the pattern is to
> > >> >> > echo rather than question and the same applies to other areas of
> > >> >> > life.
> > >> >> > It is just as likely that the group can be corrupt so "membership"
> > >> >> > can
> > >> >> > be a doom- ex: Nazis, etc.
>
> > >> >> > On Jan 25, 1:43 am, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > > If there is one concept on Earth that has been the absolute bane
> > of
> > >> >> > > human existence (besides global elitism), it would have to be the
> > >> >> > > concept of the "majority opinion". The moment men began refusing
> > >> >> > > to
> > >> >> > > develop their own world views without first asking "What does
> > >> >> > > everyone
> > >> >> > > else think?", they set themselves up for an endless future of
> > >> >> > > failures. We are, of course, very social beings, and our natures
> > >> >> > > drive us to seek those of like mind and spirit in what some might
> > >> >> > > call
> > >> >> > > a "tribal imperative". However, this imperative to organize is
> > >> >> > > often
> > >> >> > > manipulated by those who understand the psychological mechanisms
> > >> >> > > behind it. Oligarchs and tyrants abuse and exploit the inherent
> > >> >> > > social natures of the people in order to fool them into
> > abandoning
> > >> >> > > their individuality for the sake of the group, or some abstract
> > and
> > >> >> > > dishonest ideal. When successful, the organization of a culture
> > >> >> > > becomes bitter and twisted, changing from a tribe or a community
> > of
> > >> >> > > sovereign individuals, into a nightmare collective of soulless
> > >> >> > > sheep.
>
> > >> >> > > Human beings desperately want to belong, but, they also
> > desperately
> > >> >> > > want to understand the environment around them. Often, the
> > desire
> > >> >> > > to
> > >> >> > > belong and the desire to know the truth conflict. In some
> > >> >> > > societies,
> > >> >> > > in order to be accepted, one must give up on his search for truth
> > >> >> > > and
> > >> >> > > avoid eliciting the anger of others. This causes a severe mental
> > >> >> > > and
> > >> >> > > emotional disturbance within a population. In order to reconcile
> > >> >> > > their conflicting needs within a system that does not nurture
> > their
> > >> >> > > quest for transparency, they tend to unconsciously cling to the
> > >> >> > > "majority view" as if their very existence depends on it. The
> > idea
> > >> >> > > of
> > >> >> > > the majority view or the "mainstream", gives people the sense
> > that
> > >> >> > > they are a part of a group, and at the same time, gives them the
> > >> >> > > illusion of being informed.
>
> > >> >> > > The above from Zerohedge - is it right? What does it say about
> > our
> > >> >> > > general ability to argue rationally? I agree with what is said
> > >> >> > > here -
> > >> >> > > yet believe it suggests we need a radical alternative of
> > education
> > >> >> > > as
> > >> >> > > we have experienced it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> > --
>
> > >> --
> > >> (
> > >> )
> > >> |_D Allan
>
> > >> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
> > >> Of course I talk to myself,
> > >> Sometimes I need expert advice..
>
> > >> --
>
> > > --
>
> > --
> > (
> > )
> > |_D Allan
>
> > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.
>
> > Of course I talk to myself,
> > Sometimes I need expert advice..
>
> > --
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário