Re: Mind's Eye Re: Good and bad

Now that sounds more like you. :)
What you are describing or asking I now understand/interpret/hear in terms of what I know about what they are trying to find out about "junk DNA". Its purpose/function/added value. As for what you describe as another way, I know/experience/see this in what the companies describe as "developing the market". We are still on topic, aren't we? 


2013/3/21 James <ashkashal@gmail.com>
I have a feeling you are being charitable with me gabby (cringe). What you say makes sense, and should add that the intent I refer to is in excess of that needed for mere gene survival fitness. In that sense I consider the adaptations as simulations and the excess as breaking the barriers of meta-simulation, or in another way, not just running within time but operating on it by taking advantage of the rules and finding ways to bend them. Now it is my turn to ask, does that make sense [to anyone]?


On 3/20/2013 3:01 AM, gabbydott wrote:
I don't know if this is good or bad, but i hear that you haven't just heard about mirror neurons, that this is a relatively consciously made up construct, a construct with intent or purpose. Also it sounds strange when you say that this neurological mechanism is strange (to you). That's where my "parallel mirror neurons" come into play, i compare what you say with what i have heard you saying before and add the info as well as my judgement on what you say to my internal "Virtualization" of you. The leap is more of a constant exercise of differentiating between you and me while operating on the virtualization of each participant, so to speak. Does that somehow make sense to you?

Of course, I could go back to the group website and search for the real data on what you have been saying on neurological mechanisms. But this would be a completely new project. I'd have to go back and construct a new image with my knowledge of now.

But since you are still alive and still communicating, I find it much easier and more purposeful to keep on listening to what you say, to respond to it, and to rely on you saying, if you disagree. Not a good position for me to be in, more of a survival strategy. Now that's worth a leap into rethinking mode. ;)


2013/3/20 James <ashkashal@gmail.com <mailto:ashkashal@gmail.com>>


    My response was mostly a parallel narrative, my thinking on a
    personal level is when does a system of components transcend the
    boudaries of automata and begin to engage in the operations of
    intent. Where does gene fitness adaptation break loose into
    something perceiving, interacting, understanding and mastering? I
    have heard that our ability to reflect and interact on an intimate
    level arises from a strange neurological mechanism called mirror
    neurons. If this is something like the virtualization technologies
    we have been building in technology then with a bit more scale and
    pondering our science may make the leap logarithmically.


    On 3/18/2013 8:15 PM, James wrote:

        I see this sometimes too Andrew, and we learn how our internal
        systems and culture drive and shape us, so we can create. We
        model from the simplest sensory stimuli on to reflections on
        the nature of our existence and what could be in a
        simultaneous simulation of reality. Our world can be full of
        intent, or I should say we experience it thus due to our
        capacity arising from our nature and drawing parables in the
        mist. It makes me wonder how many levels of abstraction,
        simulation and foresight are necessary to represent the human
        element. That minds like ours are derived from nature is
        astonishing and awe inspiring, that we reach so far and yet
        innocence is so fragile, the experience of awareness is far
        from today's science I think. Our synthetic counterparts or
        robots will have to wait.

        On 3/13/2013 5:35 AM, andrew vecsey wrote:

            Perhaps we are born into a world filled with negative
            aspects rather than positive aspects so as to give us a
            direction. We are born small so that we can grow. We are
            born ignorant so that we could know. We are born with
            negative aspects so that we could acquire positive ones.

            On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:11:39 PM UTC+1, andrew
            vecsey wrote:

                Why do so many of us remember negative feelings easier
            than
                positive ones. Pain over pleasure. Bad news over good
            news. Why
                does "bad" overshadow "good", immorality over
            morality, despair
                over hope, pessimism over optimism. Why does hate
            appear to be
                more powerful than love? Why is greed louder than
            generosity. Why
                is destruction of war so much faster than the building
            power of
                peace. Why can one little lie destroy a lifetime of
            trust. Why are
                lies more influential than truth. It all seems so one
            sided. Why
                is that?

            --
            ---
            You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to
            minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
            <mailto:minds-eye%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.

            For more options, visit
            https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




    --
    --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:minds-eye%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.

    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--

--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário