I find this reasonable. I realize that others may not.
I had a friend, who passed away one year on my birthday at age 50, who was a genius at bringing others to the realization of what occurs at our shared soul experience. I miss her. Recognizing what comes into your awareness as part of a greater whole can only occur with shared expression. We realize how what we experience fits into the experience of the group when everyone is communicating their view. I think it is one of the reasons this group has remained important to the members. At levels seen and unseen, we continue to share the "real stuff"
On Saturday, July 13, 2013 1:34:07 AM UTC-4, Ash wrote:
-- On Saturday, July 13, 2013 1:34:07 AM UTC-4, Ash wrote:
Trust seems like a strong barrier to the future of a very open society,
even as we write some of us are making a conscious decision to expose
vulnerabilities that may be used by some unknown adversary. Just
participating in everyday life in the slightest fashion can open more
potential dangers or opportunity for it (intentional or not). It is a
dilemma that modern society pretends to be ignorant of for performance
reasons, but to achieve God-like potential we will have to resolve such
security compromises in the technical arena. I like to think within a
half century we will be able to link minds for the pursuit of common
goals and very rapidly contribute individual capacity for experience,
expertise and intuitions (probably in realtime only for that, not stored
in any fashion) in groups where multiple vectors can be explored and
shared in groups as easily as we can navigate an online strategy game
today and coordinate our efforts. For instance if I am struggling with
something emotionally my mind could reach out for compatible and
experienced individuals to help develop a better comprehension of the
problem at a far greater rate than muggling through and possibly
dragging it along. I imagine that the rate of communication in that
scenario would reduce latency to nearly nil and multiply the cognitive
potential of small groups by an unimaginable amount. There is the
question of building up to that point and technology is beginning to
integrate many facets of the real world in ways that blur the boundary.
I would love to experiment with the interfacing portion of the equation!
It is very rare that I look to the web for an answer, usually it is for
knowledge to use in finding an answer or a better question, less
disappointment that way. ;-)
On 6/29/2013 4:57 PM, archytas wrote:
> If God did not exist � people would invent one! The development of
> human civilization requires mechanisms promoting cooperation and
> social order. One of these mechanisms is based on the idea that
> everything we do is seen and judged by God � bad deeds will be
> punished, while good ones will be rewarded (or was this Santa?). The
> Information Age has
> now fueled the dream that God-like omniscience and omnipotence can
> be created by man.
>
> This is an interesting way of thinking about information systems -
> full free paper at http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1304/1304.3271.pdf
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to minds-eye+...@googlegroups.com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out .
>
>
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário